GNU bug report logs -
#75532
[PATCH 0/1] Proposed new feature for the shred command
Previous Next
Reported by: TheJostler <josj <at> tegosec.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:04:03 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: notabug, patch
Merged with 75531
Done: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 75532 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 75532 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#75532
; Package
coreutils
.
(Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:04:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
TheJostler <josj <at> tegosec.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 13 Jan 2025 06:04:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
From: Josjuar Lister <josj <at> TegoSec.com>
Hello Coreutils team,
My name is Josjuar Lister, I am a 28 year old free-lance software developer from the United Kingdom.
My main work though is System Administration and Security, and of course I'm an avid Linux user.
Shred is a tool I often used beause I like many others, value my privacy and security.
I've often needed to securely delete many files in a directory and its subdirectories, but shred does not have a feature to do this.
Oftentimes, I have written scripts to recursively shred files in a directory, but I think it would be useful to have this feature built into the shred command itself.
I decided to add this feature to the shred command and I have tested it to ensure it works as expected.
I would appreciate it if you could review this patch and consider including it in the next release of coreutils.
Kind regards,
Josjuar Lister
Josjuar Lister (1):
Added new recursive feature to the shred command
src/shred.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--
2.39.5
Information forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#75532
; Package
coreutils
.
(Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 75532 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Wouldn't it be better to use 'find' + 'shred' to do that? That should
work without any changes needed to either 'find' or 'shred'.
Also, please read this:
https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/coreutils.html#shred-invocation
to see why neither find+shred nor your proposed patch is all that
private and secure nowadays. The situation now is even dicier than it
was three decades ago when Gutmann's paper was published.
Merged 75531 75532.
Request was from
Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#75532
; Package
coreutils
.
(Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:54:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 75532 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
tag 75532 notabug
close 75532
stop
details below...
On 12/01/2025 18:50, TheJostler wrote:
> From: Josjuar Lister <josj <at> TegoSec.com>
>
> Hello Coreutils team,
>
> My name is Josjuar Lister, I am a 28 year old free-lance software developer from the United Kingdom.
> My main work though is System Administration and Security, and of course I'm an avid Linux user.
>
> Shred is a tool I often used beause I like many others, value my privacy and security.
>
> I've often needed to securely delete many files in a directory and its subdirectories, but shred does not have a feature to do this.
> Oftentimes, I have written scripts to recursively shred files in a directory, but I think it would be useful to have this feature built into the shred command itself.
> I decided to add this feature to the shred command and I have tested it to ensure it works as expected.
>
> I would appreciate it if you could review this patch and consider including it in the next release of coreutils.
This was previously discussed at:
https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/rejected_requests.html#shred
The considerations haven't changed in the meantime,
so I'm not on for applying this.
thank you,
Pádraig.
Added tag(s) notabug.
Request was from
Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:54:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
75532 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and TheJostler <josj <at> tegosec.com>
Request was from
Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:54:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 10 Feb 2025 12:24:10 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 132 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.