GNU bug report logs -
#7530
describe-function etc. should remember locations from $HOME too
Previous Next
Reported by: jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 04:00:04 UTC
Severity: minor
Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 7530 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 7530 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#7530
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 02 Dec 2010 04:00:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
jidanni <at> jidanni.org
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 02 Dec 2010 04:00:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
We do
(describe-function (quote gnus-summary-w3m-safe-toggle-inline-images))
and see
gnus-summary-w3m-safe-toggle-inline-images is an interactive compiled
Lisp function.
(gnus-summary-w3m-safe-toggle-inline-images &optional ARG)
Toggle displaying of all images in the article buffer.
If the prefix arg is given, force displaying of images.
[back]
And wonder "why does it usually say what file it is in, but not today?"
Well that is because it was in
~/.emacs-w3m.elc
~/.emacs-w3m
Therefore, when these files are initially scanned, they should be
remembered, just like all the other .el's and .elc's are. Why make an
exception for those few that are in $HOME? Same with describe-variable,
and any file read at any time.
And if an item really was from just doing a ^X^E etc. and not from any
file, the describe-* commands should mention that too! Thanks.
emacs-version "24.0.50.1"
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#7530
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:55:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 7530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
jidanni <at> jidanni.org writes:
> We do
> (describe-function (quote gnus-summary-w3m-safe-toggle-inline-images))
> and see
> gnus-summary-w3m-safe-toggle-inline-images is an interactive compiled
> Lisp function.
>
> And wonder "why does it usually say what file it is in, but not today?"
>
> Well that is because it was in
> ~/.emacs-w3m.elc
> ~/.emacs-w3m
Please provide a minimal recipe for reproducing this bug, including a
minimal .emacs file.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#7530
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 7530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> "CY" == Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com> writes:
CY> Please provide a minimal recipe for reproducing this bug, including a
CY> minimal .emacs file.
http://jidanni.org/comp/configuration/.emacs
(describe-function (quote jidanni-tidy-buffer))
Why doesn't it tell us that it came from ~/.emacs or ~/.emacs.elc?
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#7530
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 7530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
jidanni <at> jidanni.org writes:
>>>>>> "CY" == Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com> writes:
>
> CY> Please provide a minimal recipe for reproducing this bug, including a
> CY> minimal .emacs file.
>
> http://jidanni.org/comp/configuration/.emacs
> (describe-function (quote jidanni-tidy-buffer))
> Why doesn't it tell us that it came from ~/.emacs or ~/.emacs.elc?
Please provide a MINIMAL recipe for reproducing this bug. The
configuration file you specified contains links to various third-party
packages, any one of which could be causing the bug.
I tried with a .emacs file containing just the line
(defun foo () 1)
Then, in emacs,
C-h f foo RET
=> foo is a Lisp function in `.emacs'.
as expected; no bug here.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#7530
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:46:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 7530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> "CY" == Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com> writes:
CY> I tried with a .emacs file containing just the line
CY> (defun foo () 1)
CY> Then, in emacs,
CY> C-h f foo RET
CY> => foo is a Lisp function in `.emacs'.
CY> as expected; no bug here.
Ah ha! But not if you byte-compile your .emacs.
B runs the command dired-do-byte-compile ...
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#7530
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 7530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
jidanni <at> jidanni.org writes:
>>>>>> "CY" == Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com> writes:
> CY> I tried with a .emacs file containing just the line
>
> CY> (defun foo () 1)
>
> CY> Then, in emacs,
>
> CY> C-h f foo RET
> CY> => foo is a Lisp function in `.emacs'.
>
> CY> as expected; no bug here.
>
> Ah ha! But not if you byte-compile your .emacs.
> B runs the command dired-do-byte-compile ...
Fixed, thanks.
bug closed, send any further explanations to jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Request was from
Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 14 years and 215 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.