GNU bug report logs -
#75081
[PATCH] gnu: emacs-next: Update to 30.0.93.
Previous Next
Reported by: Arto Jantunen <viiru <at> iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 08:16:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Arto Jantunen <viiru <at> iki.fi>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #20 received at 75081 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Am Freitag, dem 31.01.2025 um 11:50 +0200 schrieb Arto Jantunen:
>>
>> Thanks for the very timely review.
>>
>> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> > Am Freitag, dem 31.01.2025 um 09:20 +0200 schrieb Arto Jantunen:
>> > > Update to the latest pretest.
>> > > ---
>> > There should be a ChangeLog.
>>
>> I looked at previously applied patches to find a hint about what this
>> might look like, but couldn't find anything. Would you have a
>> documentation reference or an example I could follow?
> This example is so common that we have snippets for them :)
> However, said snippet assumes you're only doing an update, which in
> this v1 at least, you don't.
If you prefer, the minimal-change version looks like this:
[0001-gnu-emacs-next-Update-to-30.0.93-0.68bcabf.patch (text/x-diff, inline)]
From 93f9a86eddf1ac24be9de1891d653d98cff65f43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <93f9a86eddf1ac24be9de1891d653d98cff65f43.1738325020.git.viiru <at> iki.fi>
From: Arto Jantunen <viiru <at> iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 13:52:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-next: Update to 30.0.93-0.68bcabf.
Change-Id: I42ed2626b01c72c6f35a0de74afd317d2a9f6ed8
---
gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
index c5e671c6a98f..9a33cb2107db 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
@@ -573,12 +573,12 @@ (define-public emacs-wide-int
#~(cons "--with-wide-int" #$flags))))))
(define-public emacs-next-minimal
- (let ((commit "881d593a9879f3355733f1b627af7cc0c12b429e")
+ (let ((commit "68bcabf58afddb377d172857ce7648ad3ff09618")
(revision "0"))
(package
(inherit emacs-minimal)
(name "emacs-next-minimal")
- (version (git-version "30.0.92" revision commit))
+ (version (git-version "30.0.93" revision commit))
(source
(origin
(method git-fetch)
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ (define-public emacs-next-minimal
(commit commit)))
(file-name (git-file-name name version))
(sha256
- (base32 "0nj3a7wsl5piqf6a8wnmfyjbpxp2dwl0r48flv9q624jx4nxfr2p"))
+ (base32 "05a587a7bnbz8ms45h4hs1c33j8268aymf3y1bpxipl3abi43jlm"))
(patches
(search-patches "emacs-disable-jit-compilation.patch"
"emacs-next-exec-path.patch"
base-commit: bdd6760b8c46e59f86415d67981acb6f77e9ed22
--
2.39.5
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
My feelings for which is the correct way to do this aren't all that
strong, all I really want is to have the current version of Emacs 30
available (who doesn't like a less buggy Emacs?)..
--
Arto Jantunen
This bug report was last modified 91 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.