GNU bug report logs -
#74979
[PATCH 0/4] scripts: style: Sort more kinds of package
Previous Next
Full log
Message #20 received at 74979 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Herman,
Herman Rimm <herman <at> rimm.ee> skribis:
> The warnings added in [PATCH 4/4] are emitted multiple times. How
> should I prevent that? Or should I put them behind a --verbose option?
Not sure, do you have an example on how to trigger it?
> +++ b/guix/scripts/style.scm
> @@ -508,9 +508,15 @@ (define (order-packages lst)
> (((or 'package 'package/inherit) fields ...)
> (let ((name (and=> (assoc-ref fields 'name) first))
> (version (and=> (assoc-ref fields 'version) first)))
> + (if (and name version)
> + (unless (and (string? name) (string? version))
> + (warning (G_ "non-string name/version for ~a~%") pkg))
> + (warning (G_ "package fields not found for ~a~%") pkg))
> (values name version)))
> - (_ (and (values #f #f)))))
> - (_ (and (values #f #f)))))
> + (_ (and (warning (G_ "package record missing for ~a~%") pkg)
> + (values #f #f)))))
> + (_ (and (info (G_ "not sorting top-level S-exp.: ~a~%") pkg)
> + (values #f #f)))))
You shouldn’t rely on the return value of ‘info’, ‘warning’, etc.:
they’re not specified (that’s generally the case for procedures called
for side effects only).
So I’d recommend:
(begin
(info …)
(values #f #f))
(You don’t even need ‘begin’ in this context.)
The other patches LGTM, though perhaps ‘tests/guix-style.sh’ could be
augmented a bit to cover the new cases?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 118 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.