GNU bug report logs -
#74980
Home container do not instantiate ~/.guix-profile
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 74980 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#74980
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 19 Dec 2024 21:16:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Gabriel Wicki <gabriel <at> erlikon.ch>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 19 Dec 2024 21:16:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi there!
Invoking a home container does not create ~/.guix-profile (which in my case
is symlinked to ~/.guix-home/profile). This leads to a problem when
testing my Emacs configuration, since I there add
~/.guix-profile/share/emacs/site-lisp to its load path.
I guess referring to ~/.guix-profile seems the smart choice, since it
could also work on home environments where I added the necessary
packages "manually" to my user's profile, so I consider only having
~/.guix-home to be somewhat off.
Any ideas on this? Is this intended behaviour? Is my configuration off?
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#74980
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 19 Dec 2024 21:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 74980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* guix/scripts/home.scm: Create the symlink.
Change-Id: Ib299c53f7cd0ca6ad204325b5c150d579224afd7
---
guix/scripts/home.scm | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/guix/scripts/home.scm b/guix/scripts/home.scm
index b4c82d275f..50aaf2abf6 100644
--- a/guix/scripts/home.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/home.scm
@@ -344,6 +344,10 @@ (define* (spawn-home-container home
(primitive-load (string-append #$home "/activate"))
(setenv "GUIX_NEW_HOME" #f)
+ (system* "ln" "-s"
+ (string-append #$home-directory "/.guix-home/profile")
+ (string-append #$home-directory "/.guix-profile"))
+
(when term
;; Preserve TERM for proper interactive use.
(setenv "TERM" term))
base-commit: c3290cee6add60b7e56f5f919d9498d78542790a
--
2.46.0
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#74980
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 21 Dec 2024 23:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 74980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Gabriel Wicki wrote on 19.12.2024 22:00 (GMT +01:00):
> * guix/scripts/home.scm: Create the symlink.
>
> Change-Id: Ib299c53f7cd0ca6ad204325b5c150d579224afd7
> ---
> guix/scripts/home.scm | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/guix/scripts/home.scm b/guix/scripts/home.scm
> index b4c82d275f..50aaf2abf6 100644
> --- a/guix/scripts/home.scm
> +++ b/guix/scripts/home.scm
> @@ -344,6 +344,10 @@ (define* (spawn-home-container home
> (primitive-load (string-append #$home "/activate"))
> (setenv "GUIX_NEW_HOME" #f)
>
> + (system* "ln" "-s"
> + (string-append #$home-directory "/.guix-home/profile")
> + (string-append #$home-directory "/.guix-profile"))
Isn't that dangerous?
What happens if you invoke "guix install xyz" after that?
That would have guix mutate the contents of ~/.guix-profile , even though the .guix-home/profile is derived from a declarative manifest, right?
Or does it at least only swap out the link for a new .guix-profile directory ?
I'm too much of a chicken to try...
I mean I can see what you mean but I'm not sure that guix expects the user to do that.
This bug report was last modified 231 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.