GNU bug report logs -
#74507
[PATCH] Indent compounds c-ts-mode when { is not BOL
Previous Next
Reported by: Jørgen Kvalsvik <j <at> lambda.is>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 09:16:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Tags: patch
Tags: patch
I found that the coumpounded statements are anchored to the wrong object
when 1. the compound is not at beginning-of-line and 2. it is not
preceeded by a construct such as fndecl/for/if/while/etc., which differs
from how c-mode indents it.
Non-BOL compound statements is actually quite common with macros and
testing frameworks (see the test case). For example, you want this to
indent:
TEST_CASE(1) {
assert (...);
}
The heuristic is quite course - it simply checks if the grandparent is
function-definition or not, which is really if this node is a top-level
sibling in the function body. If that is the case, the old rules should
apply and standalone-parent should be the guide; otherwise, it should be
the parent-BOL. This feels a bit shaky but does seem to work well for
the test cases, and can be refined in the future.
[0001-Indent-compounds-c-ts-mode-when-is-not-BOL.patch (text/patch, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 229 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.