GNU bug report logs - #74235
[PATCH] ; Remove 'nil' from some 'lua-ts-mode' options

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: john muhl <jm <at> pub.pink>

Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 21:21:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 74235 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: john muhl <jm <at> pub.pink>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 74235 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#74235: [PATCH] ; Remove 'nil' from some 'lua-ts-mode' options
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 08:57:37 -0600
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: john muhl <jm <at> pub.pink>
>> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:22:34 -0600
>> 
>> * lisp/progmodes/lua-ts-mode.el (lua-ts-luacheck-program):
>> (lua-ts-inferior-program): Remove 'nil' as it is never a valid
>> choice.  (Bug#74235)
>
> IMO, the use of these options in the code is not clean: if these
> programs are not installed, the commands which reference these options
> will signal errors whose diagnostic might not clearly indicate the
> root cause.  I would like to see a cleaner handling of such
> contingencies by this mode.  Does this make sense, and if so, would
> you like to suggest changes to that effect?

The only idea I’ve come up with so far is showing a warning that
mentions the incorrectly set option. Does that sound like what you
have in mind? If not I’d appreciate some more explicit guidance.

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 247 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.