GNU bug report logs - #73837
[PATCH] gnu: iverilog: Update to 12.0.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #26 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Zheng Junjie <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn>
To: Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org>
Cc: 73837-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Cayetano Santos via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#73837] [PATCH] gnu: iverilog: Update to 12.0.
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 22:32:35 +0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Z572 <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn> writes:

> Cayetano Santos <csantosb <at> inventati.org> writes:
>
>>>mer. 16 oct. 2024 at 20:20, Z572 <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>>
>>> Cayetano Santos via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> It is best to use git send-email, see
>>
>> I’m using send-email (?)
>
> Not sure why some people send emails containing patch that are not sent from their own mailbox
>
> e.g.
> Cayetano Santos via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
>
>
>
>>
>>> And without them, build also success.
>>
>> There is just a couple of warnings:
>>
>>   warning: no binary for interpreter `perl' found in $PATH
>>   warning: no binary for interpreter `csh' found in $PATH
>>
>> I included perl and tcsh to avoid these.
>
> In general, they may be needed for development scripts, so packaging
> does not require them. If packaging fails, you can pay attention to see
> if there is a lack of dependencies here
>
>>
>>> here is patch after the modification.
>>
>> Other than the warnings, fine with me. Any action from my side ?
>
> If there is no problem, I will push it to the warehouse later

push, close.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.