GNU bug report logs - #73743
Better prompts for Auto-save dialog

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 07:11:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: wontfix

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #42 received at 73743 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 73743 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rms <at> gnu.org, Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Subject: Re: bug#73743: Better prompts for Auto-save dialog
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:36:14 -0800
tags 73743 + wontfix
close 73743
thanks

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
>> Cc: rms <at> gnu.org,  73743 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 05:37:29 +0800
>>
>> I'm here to let everybody know,
>> that for users of emacs -nw,
>> this bug will face them several times a day.
>> Why?
>> Because
>> ^G^G^G^G^G^G...
>> is right next to
>> ^F^F^F^F^F^F...
>
> No one else complained in all the years this feature existed, so I
> think you greatly exaggerate the probability of this happening in
> reality.  My guess is that this is simply yet another attempt to
> convince that you have uncovered a grave problem, which is patently
> false.
>
>> Anyway, please change the prompt wording
>>
>> Auto-save? (y or n)
>> Abort (and dump core)? (y or n)
>>
>> to say instead
>>
>> Auto-save? (y RET or [n] RET)
>> Abort (and dump core)? (y RET or [n] RET)
>
> We never do anything like that in any other questions we ask the user,
> so I see no reason to make this case an exception (and risk confusing
> the user even more).

Agreed.  I think this is a wontfix, sorry.

I'm therefore closing this bug report.




This bug report was last modified 81 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.