GNU bug report logs - #73615
[PATCH] gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>

Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 14:25:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>
Cc: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>, 73615 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#73615] [PATCH] gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2.
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:19:25 +0100
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:

> Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com> skribis:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 6:04 PM Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure the point of having an indirect reference, so this is why I
>>> have not updated the `gdb' variable.
>>
>> Yes, that's a nice observation, if we only have one public choice then
>> why the default selector?
>>
>> 'guix refresh' shows gdb with 414 dependent packages. It would be
>> helpful if that partial dependency tree could be exported as in 'guix
>> graph' to better identity packages which could be pinned to reduce
>> that number. Even a simple option, means, or tool to filter out leaves
>> would greatly reduce the list.
>
> See <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70393>.
>
> I’ll rebase that pydevd patch and eventually apply it.

Done in 94bb6a5a88b17da1178fdc1d16cb87b9913bc1c1.

Should we (finally!) upgrade ‘gdb’ after renaming ‘gdb-14’ to ‘gdb’?

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 207 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.