GNU bug report logs - #73615
[PATCH] gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 73615 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 73615 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2.
Date: Thu,  3 Oct 2024 14:23:57 +0000

* gnu/packages/gdb.scm (gdb-15): New variable.

Change-Id: I5c234c85b904a07e8b7d247e596cd2acf8f54536
---
 gnu/packages/gdb.scm | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm
index 8fc2ec14a1..6146b104af 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm
@@ -158,6 +158,19 @@ (define-public gdb-14
                 "0wkprsjyyh204fdjlkaz20k847l88i9y8m9zqsv15vcd3l3dhk9d"))))
     (properties '())))
 
+(define-public gdb-15
+  (package
+    (inherit gdb/pinned)
+    (version "15.2")
+    (source (origin
+              (method url-fetch)
+              (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/gdb/gdb-"
+                                  version ".tar.xz"))
+              (sha256
+               (base32
+                "0k9i8mizg4hby020k53kqmc835pajh9c8d5klv5s1ddm6p6hqdc3"))))
+    (properties '())))
+
 (define-public gdb
   ;; The "default" version.
   gdb-14)

base-commit: 2f0644a8c024f589b9237e1d0fb1ce1025fa522f
-- 
2.46.2

Message #8 received at 73615 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>
To: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
Cc: 73615 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#73615] [PATCH] gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2.
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 15:36:05 -0400

On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 10:25 AM Ashish SHUKLA via Guix-patches via
<guix-patches <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
> * gnu/packages/gdb.scm (gdb-15): New variable.
>
> Change-Id: I5c234c85b904a07e8b7d247e596cd2acf8f54536
> ---
>  gnu/packages/gdb.scm | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm
> index 8fc2ec14a1..6146b104af 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm
> @@ -158,6 +158,19 @@ (define-public gdb-14
>                  "0wkprsjyyh204fdjlkaz20k847l88i9y8m9zqsv15vcd3l3dhk9d"))))
>      (properties '())))
>
> +(define-public gdb-15
> +  (package
> +    (inherit gdb/pinned)
> +    (version "15.2")
> +    (source (origin
> +              (method url-fetch)
> +              (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/gdb/gdb-"
> +                                  version ".tar.xz"))
> +              (sha256
> +               (base32
> +                "0k9i8mizg4hby020k53kqmc835pajh9c8d5klv5s1ddm6p6hqdc3"))))
> +    (properties '())))
> +
>  (define-public gdb
>    ;; The "default" version.
>    gdb-14)
>
> base-commit: 2f0644a8c024f589b9237e1d0fb1ce1025fa522f
> --
> 2.46.2

Hi Ashish,

The message summary "gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2." does not match the
patch, which leaves the default gdb as gdb-14.

Do we want to add gdb-15 or can we replace gdb-14 as was done
previously (updating gdb 12 to 14 in commit 75bad753)?

Greg

Message #11 received at 73615 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Ashish SHUKLA" <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
To: "Greg Hogan" <code <at> greghogan.com>
Cc: 73615 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#73615] [PATCH] gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2.
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:04:27 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Thu Oct 3, 2024 at 9:36 PM CEST, Greg Hogan wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 10:25 AM Ashish SHUKLA via Guix-patches via
> <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > * gnu/packages/gdb.scm (gdb-15): New variable.
> >
> > Change-Id: I5c234c85b904a07e8b7d247e596cd2acf8f54536
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/gdb.scm | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm
> > index 8fc2ec14a1..6146b104af 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm
> > @@ -158,6 +158,19 @@ (define-public gdb-14
> >                  "0wkprsjyyh204fdjlkaz20k847l88i9y8m9zqsv15vcd3l3dhk9d"))))
> >      (properties '())))
> >
> > +(define-public gdb-15
> > +  (package
> > +    (inherit gdb/pinned)
> > +    (version "15.2")
> > +    (source (origin
> > +              (method url-fetch)
> > +              (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/gdb/gdb-"
> > +                                  version ".tar.xz"))
> > +              (sha256
> > +               (base32
> > +                "0k9i8mizg4hby020k53kqmc835pajh9c8d5klv5s1ddm6p6hqdc3"))))
> > +    (properties '())))
> > +
> >  (define-public gdb
> >    ;; The "default" version.
> >    gdb-14)
> >
> > base-commit: 2f0644a8c024f589b9237e1d0fb1ce1025fa522f
> > --
> > 2.46.2
>
> Hi Ashish,
>
> The message summary "gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2." does not match the
> patch, which leaves the default gdb as gdb-14.
>
> Do we want to add gdb-15 or can we replace gdb-14 as was done
> previously (updating gdb 12 to 14 in commit 75bad753)?

Hi Greg,

Thanks for reviewing the diff.

I agree the title of the diff is not quite accurate. Sorry about that.

I'm not sure the point of having an indirect reference, so this is why I
have not updated the `gdb' variable.

Let me know if it's needed. I can revise my commit then.

Thanks!
--
Ashish

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #14 received at 73615 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>
To: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
Cc: 73615 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#73615] [PATCH] gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2.
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 07:05:36 -0400

On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 6:04 PM Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure the point of having an indirect reference, so this is why I
> have not updated the `gdb' variable.

Yes, that's a nice observation, if we only have one public choice then
why the default selector?

'guix refresh' shows gdb with 414 dependent packages. It would be
helpful if that partial dependency tree could be exported as in 'guix
graph' to better identity packages which could be pinned to reduce
that number. Even a simple option, means, or tool to filter out leaves
would greatly reduce the list.

Message #17 received at 73615 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>
Cc: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>, 73615 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#73615] [PATCH] gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2.
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:49:52 +0200

Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com> skribis:

> On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 6:04 PM Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure the point of having an indirect reference, so this is why I
>> have not updated the `gdb' variable.
>
> Yes, that's a nice observation, if we only have one public choice then
> why the default selector?
>
> 'guix refresh' shows gdb with 414 dependent packages. It would be
> helpful if that partial dependency tree could be exported as in 'guix
> graph' to better identity packages which could be pinned to reduce
> that number. Even a simple option, means, or tool to filter out leaves
> would greatly reduce the list.

See <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70393>.

I’ll rebase that pydevd patch and eventually apply it.

Ludo’.

Message #22 received at 73615 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>
Cc: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>, 73615 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#73615] [PATCH] gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2.
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:19:25 +0100

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:

> Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com> skribis:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 6:04 PM Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure the point of having an indirect reference, so this is why I
>>> have not updated the `gdb' variable.
>>
>> Yes, that's a nice observation, if we only have one public choice then
>> why the default selector?
>>
>> 'guix refresh' shows gdb with 414 dependent packages. It would be
>> helpful if that partial dependency tree could be exported as in 'guix
>> graph' to better identity packages which could be pinned to reduce
>> that number. Even a simple option, means, or tool to filter out leaves
>> would greatly reduce the list.
>
> See <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70393>.
>
> I’ll rebase that pydevd patch and eventually apply it.

Done in 94bb6a5a88b17da1178fdc1d16cb87b9913bc1c1.

Should we (finally!) upgrade ‘gdb’ after renaming ‘gdb-14’ to ‘gdb’?

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.