GNU bug report logs - #73613
texlive packages such as texlive-luatex are not reproducible

Previous Next

Full log

Message #17 received at 73613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: 73613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#73613: texlive-luatex is not reproducible
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 00:06:04 +0900

Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> This was discovered building texlive-luatex twice (--rounds=2 -K);
>> diffoscope shows that:
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> These are apparently time stamps as well as UUIDs.  Debian [0, 1] and
>> NixOS [1] have patched some of them using faketime and substitute [0].
>>
>> We should follow suite.
>>
>> [0]  https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/blob/master/examples/hooks/reproducible/2006-reproducible-texlive-binaries-fmt-files.hook.chroot
>> [1]  https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/227873
>
> This is difficult to follow, because Debian and NixOS do not seem to
> apply the same fixes. For example, the former wraps "faketime" around
> "tex -ini tex.ini" call whereas the latter wraps it around
> "fmtutil-sys --all" call.
>
> By the way, how do you call "faketime" from (guix build-system texlive)?
> It is not possible to use (gnu packages check) module from there, isn't
> it?

You'd have to add it to the implicit inputs defined for the build
system.

> Note that Guix never runs "mtxrun --generate", so I don't think UUIDs
> are a problem in our case.

OK.  I'm afraid don't have more insights than what I had shared already
:-).

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.