GNU bug report logs -
#73613
texlive packages such as texlive-luatex are not reproducible
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 73613 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73613
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 03 Oct 2024 12:20:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 03 Oct 2024 12:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
This was discovered building texlive-luatex twice (--rounds=2 -K);
diffoscope shows that:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
│ │ │ │ ├── +++ /gnu/store/jyfqmfrhg3m0njdy8yi0qrgqfilaldf2-texlive-luatex-2024.2-check/share/texmf-dist/web2c/luatex/dviluatex.fmt
│ │ │ │ │ ├── dviluatex.fmt-content
│ │ │ │ │ │┄ xxd not available in path. Falling back to Python hexlify.
│ │ │ │ │ │ @@ -231852,20 +231852,20 @@
│ │ │ │ │ │ 3373796c203174696d20327431696e203174696f203574697120746934752072
│ │ │ │ │ │ 733565722e2031746976206d65347461206c75737334203174697a206d653174
│ │ │ │ │ │ 65206d34657472207561356e612074356c612075616e3469206c3576656e2075
│ │ │ │ │ │ 74696f6e3561206c35766574342074356c6f20746d653420747261336220746f
│ │ │ │ │ │ 33622032746f6620747261733420756172326420746f7332206572346e697320
│ │ │ │ │ │ 7561723369203465726e6974203565726e697a20756172337420346669636174
│ │ │ │ │ │ 6520347561622075616334203174726120753161742075623465207561763420
│ │ │ │ │ │ -75316234692000000000aa206f626c69672d612d746f7279206465632d6c692d
│ │ │ │ │ │ -6e612d74696f6e2061732d736f2d6369617465732061732d736f2d6369617465
│ │ │ │ │ │ -20726563692d70726f636974792072652d636f672d6e692d7a616e6365207265
│ │ │ │ │ │ -742d72692d62752d74696f6e207265662d6f722d6d612d74696f6e2070726f6a
│ │ │ │ │ │ -656374732074612d626c652070726573656e7473207068696c2d616e2d746872
│ │ │ │ │ │ -6f7069632070726f6a6563742070726573656e74000000000100000001000000
│ │ │ │ │ │ +75316234692000000000aa2070726573656e74732074612d626c652070726573
│ │ │ │ │ │ +656e74206465632d6c692d6e612d74696f6e2070726f6a6563742061732d736f
│ │ │ │ │ │ +2d636961746573207265662d6f722d6d612d74696f6e207265742d72692d6275
│ │ │ │ │ │ +2d74696f6e2072652d636f672d6e692d7a616e63652061732d736f2d63696174
│ │ │ │ │ │ +6520726563692d70726f63697479206f626c69672d612d746f72792070726f6a
│ │ │ │ │ │ +65637473207068696c2d616e2d7468726f706963000000000100000001000000
│ │ │ │ │ │ 2d000000000000000000000000ffffffff00041d8d7562326c20327472656220
│ │ │ │ │ │ 32747265632032743372656420327433726567206d65733473616c2075633163
│ │ │ │ │ │ 20327433726568206d65733473616e2032743372656b2032743372656c202e66
│ │ │ │ │ │ 6cc3b636733573656e2e20753163692074327279206d65733473617520753163
│ │ │ │ │ │ 6c20757333c3a47320756175327320676133756e74206d657334736179207472
│ │ │ │ │ │ 3465327520753364326120327433726576206e7433c3a46e64206e653473616c
│ │ │ │ │ │ 20753163722074327333733220747265337820747374322032743372657a202e
│ │ │ │ │ │ @@ -268094,99 +268094,99 @@
│ │ │ │ │ │ 2033746f2e2074336c612074336c692068696537726f6e792074336c6f206161
│ │ │ │ │ │ 74367374692069653673377461616c207661346b6573206d616e366e2d70206e
│ │ │ │ │ │ 7661366c697320c3af6e35756e642073356b616b7420347472616620616c6937
│ │ │ │ │ │ 676c617320753462336167203473356b616c662033746f672075626173342074
│ │ │ │ │ │ 7261743420746f3173207661356b69652065336b616e2061726b366c6f73202e
│ │ │ │ │ │ 7369377261672e2065657273376c616d2034736b61722e202e7a653575732034
│ │ │ │ │ │ 736b616e742061723664356167742075623366206e6534726f73200000000a9b
│ │ │ │ │ │ -20706161726c2d6f6f7320646575722d737765722d776520706f652d746f652d
│ │ │ │ │ │ -706170207672652d6465732d656e2d67656c206f6d2d6d652d7377616169206f
│ │ │ │ │ │ -2d72612d676965206c616e672d7465722d6d796e2d696d2d70616b20696e2d74
│ │ │ │ │ │ -77792d66656c2d7472656b2d6b696e672076616c2d726565702d6c6565722067
│ │ │ │ │ │ -652d626564732d6b65742d74696e6720626161642d6a69652d6d6f752d652064
│ │ │ │ │ │ -72756b2d6b65722d666f6e7473206c696d662d776565662d73656c206b616d2d
│ │ │ │ │ │ -7374692d676520737472652d706965732d6665722d7765656c2064692d612d6c
│ │ │ │ │ │ -656b2d776f6f722d64652d626f656b20747769732d61702d70656c206d61616e
[...]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
These are apparently time stamps as well as UUIDs. Debian [0, 1] and
NixOS [1] have patched some of them using faketime and substitute [0].
We should follow suite.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/blob/master/examples/hooks/reproducible/2006-reproducible-texlive-binaries-fmt-files.hook.chroot
[1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/227873
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Changed bug title to 'texlive packages such as texlive-luatex are not reproducible' from 'texlive-luatex is not reproducible'
Request was from
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 03 Oct 2024 13:26:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
Request was from
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Merged 48064 48455 73613.
Request was from
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:27:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73613
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 20 Oct 2024 08:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 73613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
> This was discovered building texlive-luatex twice (--rounds=2 -K);
> diffoscope shows that:
>
[...]
> These are apparently time stamps as well as UUIDs. Debian [0, 1] and
> NixOS [1] have patched some of them using faketime and substitute [0].
>
> We should follow suite.
>
> [0] https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/blob/master/examples/hooks/reproducible/2006-reproducible-texlive-binaries-fmt-files.hook.chroot
> [1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/227873
This is difficult to follow, because Debian and NixOS do not seem to
apply the same fixes. For example, the former wraps "faketime" around
"tex -ini tex.ini" call whereas the latter wraps it around
"fmtutil-sys --all" call.
By the way, how do you call "faketime" from (guix build-system texlive)?
It is not possible to use (gnu packages check) module from there, isn't
it?
Note that Guix never runs "mtxrun --generate", so I don't think UUIDs
are a problem in our case.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73613
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 14 Dec 2024 15:08:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 73613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> This was discovered building texlive-luatex twice (--rounds=2 -K);
>> diffoscope shows that:
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> These are apparently time stamps as well as UUIDs. Debian [0, 1] and
>> NixOS [1] have patched some of them using faketime and substitute [0].
>>
>> We should follow suite.
>>
>> [0] https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/blob/master/examples/hooks/reproducible/2006-reproducible-texlive-binaries-fmt-files.hook.chroot
>> [1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/227873
>
> This is difficult to follow, because Debian and NixOS do not seem to
> apply the same fixes. For example, the former wraps "faketime" around
> "tex -ini tex.ini" call whereas the latter wraps it around
> "fmtutil-sys --all" call.
>
> By the way, how do you call "faketime" from (guix build-system texlive)?
> It is not possible to use (gnu packages check) module from there, isn't
> it?
You'd have to add it to the implicit inputs defined for the build
system.
> Note that Guix never runs "mtxrun --generate", so I don't think UUIDs
> are a problem in our case.
OK. I'm afraid don't have more insights than what I had shared already
:-).
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73613
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 73613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>
>> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> This was discovered building texlive-luatex twice (--rounds=2 -K);
>>> diffoscope shows that:
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> These are apparently time stamps as well as UUIDs. Debian [0, 1] and
>>> NixOS [1] have patched some of them using faketime and substitute [0].
>>>
>>> We should follow suite.
>>>
>>> [0] https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/blob/master/examples/hooks/reproducible/2006-reproducible-texlive-binaries-fmt-files.hook.chroot
>>> [1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/227873
>>
>> This is difficult to follow, because Debian and NixOS do not seem to
>> apply the same fixes. For example, the former wraps "faketime" around
>> "tex -ini tex.ini" call whereas the latter wraps it around
>> "fmtutil-sys --all" call.
>>
>> By the way, how do you call "faketime" from (guix build-system texlive)?
>> It is not possible to use (gnu packages check) module from there, isn't
>> it?
>
> You'd have to add it to the implicit inputs defined for the build
> system.
>
>> Note that Guix never runs "mtxrun --generate", so I don't think UUIDs
>> are a problem in our case.
>
> OK. I'm afraid don't have more insights than what I had shared already
> :-).
Modular TeX Live is expected to be reproducible on "tex-team" branch.
Monolithic TeX Live can be fixed directly on master branch.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#73613
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:33:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 73613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
[...]
> Modular TeX Live is expected to be reproducible on "tex-team" branch.
> Monolithic TeX Live can be fixed directly on master branch.
Wow! Well done, Nicolas!
--
Thanks,
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 121 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.