GNU bug report logs - #73312
31.0.50; textsec test failure because of UTS #46 changes

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 73312 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#73312: 31.0.50; textsec test failure because of UTS #46 changes
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:10:38 +0300

> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:11:50 +0200
> 
> Following the update to Unicode 16, the textsec tests now fail:
> 
>   GEN      lisp/international/textsec-tests.log
> Running 12 tests (2024-09-17 11:51:51+0200, selector `(not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :nativecomp)))')
>    passed   1/12  test-confusable (0.001562 sec)
>    passed   2/12  test-minimal-scripts (0.000155 sec)
>    passed   3/12  test-mixed-numbers (0.000846 sec)
>    passed   4/12  test-resolved (0.000120 sec)
>    passed   5/12  test-restriction-level (0.000259 sec)
>    passed   6/12  test-scripts (0.000354 sec)
>    passed   7/12  test-suspicious-email (0.001587 sec)
>    passed   8/12  test-suspicious-link (0.015283 sec)
>    passed   9/12  test-suspicious-local (0.000522 sec)
>    passed  10/12  test-suspicious-name (0.000420 sec)
>    passed  11/12  test-suspicious-url (0.000498 sec)
> Test test-suspiction-domain backtrace:
>   signal(ert-test-failed (((should (textsec-domain-suspicious-p "foo/b
>   ert-fail(((should (textsec-domain-suspicious-p "foo/bar.org")) :form
>   (if (unwind-protect (setq value-222 (apply fn-220 args-221)) (setq f
>   (let (form-description-224) (if (unwind-protect (setq value-222 (app
>   (let ((value-222 'ert-form-evaluation-aborted-223)) (let (form-descr
>   (let* ((fn-220 #'textsec-domain-suspicious-p) (args-221 (condition-c
>   #f(lambda () [t] (let* ((fn-220 #'textsec-domain-suspicious-p) (args
>   #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode -0x167cc0e1752f76aa>)()
>   handler-bind-1(#f(compiled-function () #<bytecode -0x167cc0e1752f76a
>   ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
>   ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name test-suspiction-domain :documentation
>   ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector ... :tests ... :test-m
>   ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :nativecomp))) #f(compil
>   ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :nativecomp))))
>   ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :nativeco
>   eval((ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit '(not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :n
>   command-line-1(("-L" ":." "-l" "ert" "--eval" "(setq treesit-extra-l
>   command-line()
>   normal-top-level()
> Test test-suspiction-domain condition:
>     (ert-test-failed
>      ((should (textsec-domain-suspicious-p "foo/bar.org")) :form
>       (textsec-domain-suspicious-p "foo/bar.org") :value nil))
>    FAILED  12/12  test-suspiction-domain (0.000228 sec) at lisp/international/textsec-tests.el:114
> 
> Ran 12 tests, 11 results as expected, 1 unexpected (2024-09-17 11:51:51+0200, 0.102143 sec)
> 
> 1 unexpected results:
>    FAILED  test-suspiction-domain
> 
> This is because UTS #46 in their infinite wisdom have decided to change
> the rules on how to check what is considered an allowed character in a
> domain name. Previously, IdnaMappingTable.txt contained eg:
> 
> 002F          ; disallowed_STD3_valid                  # 1.1  SOLIDUS
> 
> but now it contains
> 
> 002F          ; valid      ;      ; NV8    # 1.1  SOLIDUS
> 
> with a change to section 4.1 of UTS#46 saying that only [a-z0-9-] are
> allowed for ASCII. Note that theyʼve helpfully marked
> valid-but-invalid-in-idna characters with either NV8 or XV8, but then
> have unhelpfully said that those markings are not normative. <sigh>
> 
> Anyway, willfully ignoring their verbiage about normative markings,
> the following fixes it for me, at least until the next version of UTS
> #46, I guess.

Please install, and thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.