GNU bug report logs -
#73216
[PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add emacs-org-texlive-collection.
Previous Next
Full log
Message #23 received at 73216 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am Freitag, dem 13.09.2024 um 23:16 +0900 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> Hi Liliana,
>
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > > +(define-public emacs-org-texlive-collection
> > > + (package
> > > + (inherit emacs-org)
> > > + (name "emacs-org-texlive-collection")
> > > + (source #f)
> > > + (build-system trivial-build-system)
> > > + (arguments (list #:builder #~(mkdir #$output)))
> > > + (native-inputs '())
> > > + (inputs '())
> > > + (propagated-inputs
> > > + (list texlive-amsmath
> > > + texlive-capt-of
> > > + texlive-graphics ;for graphicx, rotating
> > > + texlive-hyperref
> > > + texlive-titling
> > > + texlive-tools ;for longtable
> > > + texlive-ulem
> > > + texlive-wrapfig
> > > + texlive-scheme-small)) ;for amsfonts, fontspec,
> > > inputenc, etc.
> > Nitpick: these comments are not aligned.
>
> This is actually how Emacs aligns them automatically, which I tend to
> stick to to avoid noise in diffs.
You might want to press M-; on that last one – I don't think it's
aligned as per Emacs.
> > As a personal thing, I also suggest using a space between ; and
> > for, but I see both styles used in Guix.
>
> A space following ';' for inline comments is actually what seems to
> be our adopted convention (see "Riastradh's Lisp Style Rules",
> https://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/style.txt referenced from (info
> '(guix) Formatting Code')).
>
> I must have dreamt Ludo suggestion to drop the space at some point in
> the distant past. I'll try to go back to '; comment' in my code, I
> guess!
Oh, good to know!
Cheers
This bug report was last modified 311 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.