GNU bug report logs - #73215
14.0.5; What about excluding .dir-locals.el from GNU ELPA tarballs

Previous Next

Package: auctex;

Reported by: Lin Jian <me <at> linj.tech>

Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:42:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 14.0.5

Done: Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 73215 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 73215 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-auctex <at> gnu.org:
bug#73215; Package auctex. (Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:42:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Lin Jian <me <at> linj.tech>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-auctex <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:42:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lin Jian <me <at> linj.tech>
To: bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
Subject: 14.0.5; What about excluding .dir-locals.el from GNU ELPA tarballs
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:40:44 +0800
Dear AUCTeX maintainers,

Currently, the .dir-locals.el file is included in the GNU ELPA
tarball[1], which causes this compilation error[2] when doing AOT native
compilation for Emacs lisp packages in NixOS.

Error: wrong-type-argument ("/nix/store/<hash>-emacs-auctex-14.0.6/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa/auctex-14.0.6/.dir-locals.el" proper-list-p (log-edit-font-lock-gnu-style . t))
  mapbacktrace(#f(compiled-function (evald func args flags) #<bytecode -0xf42c55d2510e41>))
  debug-early-backtrace()
  debug-early(error (wrong-type-argument "/nix/store/<hash>-emacs-auctex-14.0.6/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa/auctex-14.0.6/.dir-locals.el" proper-list-p (log-edit-font-lock-gnu-style . t)))
  signal(wrong-type-argument ("/nix/store/<hash>-emacs-auctex-14.0.6/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa/auctex-14.0.6/.dir-locals.el" proper-list-p (log-edit-font-lock-gnu-style . t)))
  comp--native-compile("/nix/store/<hash>-emacs-auctex-14.0.6/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa/auctex-14.0.6/.dir-locals.el")
  batch-native-compile()
  command-line-1(("--eval" "(setq large-file-warning-threshold nil)" "--eval" "(setq byte-compile-error-on-warn nil)" "-f" "batch-native-compile" "/nix/store/<hash>-emacs-auctex-14.0.6/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa/auctex-14.0.6/.dir-locals.el"))
  command-line()
  normal-top-level()
Wrong type argument: "/nix/store/<hash>-emacs-auctex-14.0.6/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa/auctex-14.0.6/.dir-locals.el", proper-list-p, (#<symbol log-edit-font-lock-gnu-style at 424> . #<symbol t at 455>)

We can workaround this by skipping native compilation for
.dir-locals.el.  However, I do not think .dir-locals.el has to be
included in the GNU ELPA tarball.  In addition, MELPA ignores[3] that
file by default.

Could you exclude .dir-locals.el from GNU ELPA tarball?  FYI,
:ignored-files[4] of GNU ELPA specification can be used to do this.

[1]: https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/auctex-14.0.6.tar
[2]: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/271252219/nixlog/1
[3]: https://github.com/melpa/melpa/blob/0c608bf895a3b5230b781662510e1326af17ea13/README.md?plain=1#L169-L170
[4]: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/elpa.git/tree/README?id=51936a29b693bfc5f4f92e365b485a7c547b2ac1#n175

Best wishes,
Lin Jian




Information forwarded to bug-auctex <at> gnu.org:
bug#73215; Package auctex. (Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:01:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 73215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp>
To: Lin Jian <me <at> linj.tech>
Cc: 73215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#73215: 14.0.5;
 What about excluding .dir-locals.el from GNU ELPA tarballs
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 15:00:45 +0900
Hi Lin,

>>>>> Lin Jian via bug-auctex via Bug reporting list for AUCTeX <bug-auctex <at> gnu.> Currently, the .dir-locals.el file is included in the GNU ELPA
> tarball[1], which causes this compilation error[2] when doing AOT native
> compilation for Emacs lisp packages in NixOS.

> We can workaround this by skipping native compilation for
> .dir-locals.el.  However, I do not think .dir-locals.el has to be
> included in the GNU ELPA tarball.  In addition, MELPA ignores[3] that
> file by default.

> Could you exclude .dir-locals.el from GNU ELPA tarball?  FYI,
> :ignored-files[4] of GNU ELPA specification can be used to do this.

Thanks for your suggestion. I adapted .elpaignore instead to remove
obsolete entries at the same time. I'll close this bug.

Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW




bug closed, send any further explanations to 73215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Lin Jian <me <at> linj.tech> Request was from Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:02:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 312 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.