GNU bug report logs -
#72704
29.4; repunctuate-sentences ignores NO-QUERY
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Joseph Turner <joseph <at> breatheoutbreathe.in>
>> Cc: Brian Green <briandg <at> gmail.com>, rms <at> gnu.org, 72704 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>> juri <at> linkov.net
>> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 10:09:10 -0700
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> >> From: Brian Green <briandg <at> gmail.com>
>> >> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 01:29:11 -0700
>> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, rms <at> gnu.org, 72704 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, juri <at> linkov.net
>> >>
>> >> I submitted this "bug" report because I mis-interpreted the docstring,
>> >> and because I was approaching this command with a preconceived idea
>> >> about how it should work. I think Eli is right. I can't think of a
>> >> good reason why I would need to stipulate a certain behavior before
>> >> calling the command which I can already get at any point while the
>> >> command is running.
>> >
>> > The doc string indeed could use some improvements, at least in stating
>> > explicitly what happens in interactive usage and what only when called
>> > from Lisp.
>>
>> See patch. Is the text wrapping acceptable? It looks too long in
>> paragraphs.el but good in the *Help* buffer.
>
> Is this instead of the code change or in addition to it?
Instead.
> In any case, I think it would be better to say
>
> Noninteractively, if optional argument NO-QUERY is non-nil, make changes
> without asking for confirmation. To achieve the same effect
> interactively, press \\<query-replace-map>\\[automatic] at the first...
Okay! With the attached patch, I'm content to close this issue.
[0001-Clarify-skipping-prompts-in-repunctuate-sentences-do.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 289 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.