GNU bug report logs - #72704
29.4; repunctuate-sentences ignores NO-QUERY

Previous Next

Full log

Message #41 received at 72704 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Joseph Turner <joseph <at> breatheoutbreathe.in>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Brian Green <briandg <at> gmail.com>, juri <at> linkov.net, rms <at> gnu.org,
 72704 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#72704: 29.4; repunctuate-sentences ignores NO-QUERY
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 10:09:10 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Brian Green <briandg <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 01:29:11 -0700
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, rms <at> gnu.org, 72704 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, juri <at> linkov.net
>> 
>> I submitted this "bug" report because I mis-interpreted the docstring,
>> and because I was approaching this command with a preconceived idea
>> about how it should work.  I think Eli is right.  I can't think of a
>> good reason why I would need to stipulate a certain behavior before
>> calling the command which I can already get at any point while the
>> command is running.
>
> The doc string indeed could use some improvements, at least in stating
> explicitly what happens in interactive usage and what only when called
> from Lisp.

See patch.  Is the text wrapping acceptable?  It looks too long in
paragraphs.el but good in the *Help* buffer.

[0001-Clarify-skipping-prompts-in-repunctuate-sentences-do.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.