GNU bug report logs -
#72404
30.0.60; Customization of options is broken
Previous Next
Reported by: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 17:33:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Merged with 72156
Found in versions 30.0.60, 31.0.50
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On Sun, 04 Aug 2024 10:49:52 +0300 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
>> Cc: john muhl <jm <at> pub.pink>, juri <at> linkov.net, maurooaranda <at> gmail.com,
>> 72404 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 19:28:04 +0200
>>
>> On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 12:12:52 +0200 Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>> I did happen to have a bit more time for this problem, and I think I've
>> found the cause, a single line in commit 8d354925ddb:
>>
>> diff --git a/lisp/wid-edit.el b/lisp/wid-edit.el
>> index 693991a6f3e..aa653549dad 100644
>> --- a/lisp/wid-edit.el
>> +++ b/lisp/wid-edit.el
>> @@ -2549,7 +2549,8 @@ widget-checklist-add-item
>> (t
>> (widget-create-child-value
>> widget type (car (cdr chosen)))
>> - (widget-specify-selected child)))))
>> + ;; (widget-specify-selected child)
>> + ))))
>> (t
>> (error "Unknown escape `%c'" escape)))))
>> ;; Update properties.
>>
>> With this line commented out as in the above patch, I get the expected
>> value when carrying out Juri's recipe. Moreover, after making that
>> change, I then briefly tested customizing the face widget-unselected
>> (which the problematic commit added) to inherit from the default face
>> and it shows the labels of unselected check boxes in the default face,
>> as it should. So maybe deleting the commented out line above and
>> leaving the rest of the change is a sufficient fix. But I have to admit
>> I don't know why that line causes the problem, and I haven't done enough
>> testing of this change to the widget-unselected face feature, so this is
>> just a status report.
>
> Thanks, I installed the above fix.
Thanks, this seems at least a plausible stopgap.
> It turns out the same problem also caused bug#72156, so I've now
> merged them.
>
> I'm leaving this bug open, in the hope that you or someone else will
> find the root cause for the regression and fix it.
I will try to debug it further, but I do hope Mauro or someone else more
familiar with the widget and custom code than I am will look into it.
Steve Berman
This bug report was last modified 127 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.