GNU bug report logs - #72381
srfi-64: test-result-remove fails to remove property

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>

Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:53:16 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 72381 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 72381 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#72381; Package guile. (Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:53:16 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guile <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:53:16 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: srfi-64: test-result-remove fails to remove property
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:51:59 +0200
Hello,

I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.

When I try to remove a property from the result alist using this code:

    (use-modules (srfi srfi-64))
    (let ((r (test-runner-null)))
      (test-result-set! r 'arstars 'a)
      (test-result-remove r 'arstars))

I get the following error:

    Backtrace:
    In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
      1752:10  8 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
    In unknown file:
               7 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7f0fcff80300>)
    In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
        724:2  6 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handler (k proc)>)
    In ice-9/eval.scm:
        619:8  5 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7f0fcff83c80>)))
    In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
       2836:4  4 (save-module-excursion _)
      4388:12  3 (_)
    In srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm:
       546:35  2 (test-result-remove #<test-runner pass-count: 0 fail-count: 0 xpass-count: 0…> …)
       548:55  1 (loop ((arstars . a)))
       548:47  0 (loop ())

    srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm:548:47: In procedure loop:
    In procedure car: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting pair): ()

From cursory look at the `test-result-remove' source, is seems that the named
let `loop' is missing a stop condition?

Have a nice day
Tomas Volf




Information forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#72381; Package guile. (Tue, 01 Oct 2024 22:40:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 72381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Taylan Kammer <taylan.kammer <at> gmail.com>
To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, 72381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#72381: srfi-64: test-result-remove fails to remove property
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 00:37:59 +0200
On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
>
> When I try to remove a property from the result alist using this code:
>
>     (use-modules (srfi srfi-64))
>     (let ((r (test-runner-null)))
>       (test-result-set! r 'arstars 'a)
>       (test-result-remove r 'arstars))
>
> I get the following error:
>
>     Backtrace:
>     In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>       1752:10  8 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
>     In unknown file:
>                7 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7f0fcff80300>)
>     In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>         724:2  6 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handler (k proc)>)
>     In ice-9/eval.scm:
>         619:8  5 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7f0fcff83c80>)))
>     In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>        2836:4  4 (save-module-excursion _)
>       4388:12  3 (_)
>     In srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm:
>        546:35  2 (test-result-remove #<test-runner pass-count: 0 fail-count: 0 xpass-count: 0…> …)
>        548:55  1 (loop ((arstars . a)))
>        548:47  0 (loop ())
>
>     srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm:548:47: In procedure loop:
>     In procedure car: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting pair): ()
>
> From cursory look at the `test-result-remove' source, is seems that the named
> let `loop' is missing a stop condition?
>
> Have a nice day
> Tomas Volf
>
>
Your diagnosis sounds correct to me. A null check should fix it.

However, it's already fixed in my SRFI-64 implementation, thanks to using clean coding practices such as: "Don't reinvent SRFI-1." :-)

- Taylan





bug closed, send any further explanations to 72381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> Request was from Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 21 Oct 2024 20:29:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:24:25 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 298 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.