GNU bug report logs -
#72298
Should python-mode-abbrev-table declare :parents python-base-mode-abbrev-table?
Previous Next
Reported by: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:15:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> From: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 09:53:15 -0400
>
> Greetings. Curious if I'm barking up the wrong tree with this assessment...
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 2:33 PM Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> An example of a personal hack to make this work could be to add something like this to a
> python-mode-hook:
>
> (if (derived-mode-p 'python-base-mode)
> (setq local-abbrev-table python-base-mode-abbrev-table))
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 2:15 PM Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was expecting that python-base-mode-abbrev-table would apply to both python-mode and
> python-ts-mode buffers. python-ts-mode doesn't derive from python-mode so the abbrev tables
> aren't shared by default. Unless I'm missing something, using a base table doesn't work for me.
>
> (define-abbrev-table 'python-mode-abbrev-table ()
> "Abbrev table for Python mode."
> ;; should this:
> :parents (list python-mode-skeleton-abbrev-table))
> ;; be defined thusly?
> :parents (list python-base-mode-abbrev-table python-mode-skeleton-abbrev-table))
>
> I tried to find guidance on this outside of hacking abbrev tables manually to be shared. Perhaps
> other people have the same expectation.
kobarity, any comments?
This bug report was last modified 267 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.