GNU bug report logs - #720
Patch to fix CVS Emacs compilation error on Windows XP SP2.

Previous Next

Packages: w32, emacs;

Reported by: Francis Litterio <flitterio <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:10:04 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Fran Litterio <flitterio <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#720: Patch to fix CVS Emacs compilation error on Windows XP SP2.
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:37:05 +0300
> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:11:45 -0400
> From: "Fran Litterio" <flitterio <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: 720 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> 
> > >   w32.c(3823) : error C2059: syntax error : 'bad suffix on number'
> > >   w32.c(3823) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ')' before identifier
> > 'L'
> > >   w32.c(3823) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
> > >   w32.c(3824) : error C2059: syntax error : 'bad suffix on number'
> > >   w32.c(3824) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier
> > 'L'
> > >   w32.c(3824) : error C2065: 'L' : undeclared identifier
> >
> > Does it mean that the LL suffix is not supported in VS 6?
> 
> 
> I think so.
> 
> 
> > Can you try
> > the same without the 2 LL suffixes?
> >
> 
> Yes, omitting the LL suffixes compiles with VS 6, though with several of
> these warnings:
> 
>    warning C4244: '=' : conversion from 'long double ' to 'long ', possible
> loss of data

Thanks, I installed the version without LL suffixes.




This bug report was last modified 16 years and 342 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.