GNU bug report logs - #720
Patch to fix CVS Emacs compilation error on Windows XP SP2.

Previous Next

Packages: w32, emacs;

Reported by: Francis Litterio <flitterio <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:10:04 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #69 received at 720 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Francis Litterio <flitterio <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#720: Patch to fix CVS Emacs compilation error on Windows XP SP2.
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:15:12 +0300
> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:22:31 -0400
> From: Francis Litterio <flitterio <at> gmail.com>
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> >> From: Francis Litterio
> >> 
> >> 	w32.c(3820) : error C2520: conversion from unsigned __int64 to double not implemented, use signed __int64
> >
> > "Not implemented"?  I'm not sure we want to support such a deficient
> > compiler.
> 
> I would happily use a newer compiler.  The file emacs/nt/INSTALL says
> this:
> 
>    To compile Emacs, you will need either Microsoft Visual C++ 2.0, or
>    later up to 7.0, and nmake
> 
> I didn't realize that I could use a version of VC++ newer than 6.0.  I
> would be happy to abandon 6.0 for building Emacs on Windows.  Is VC++
> 7.0 the compiler that comes with Visual Studio 2003?

Yes.

> What compiler do the Emacs developers use to build on Windows?

The MinGW port of GCC.

> > How about this:
> >
> >   DWORD tot_hi = memstex.ullTotalPhys >> 32;
> >   DWORD tot_md = (memstex.ullTotalPhys & 0x00000000ffffffffLL) >> 10;
> >   DWORD tot_lo = memstex.ullTotalPhys % 1024LL;
> >   totphys = tot_hi * 4194304.0 + tot_md + tot_lo / 1024.0;
> >
> > Does this work?
> 
> Nope:
> 
>   w32.c(3823) : error C2059: syntax error : 'bad suffix on number'
>   w32.c(3823) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ')' before identifier 'L'
>   w32.c(3823) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
>   w32.c(3824) : error C2059: syntax error : 'bad suffix on number'
>   w32.c(3824) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 'L'
>   w32.c(3824) : error C2065: 'L' : undeclared identifier

Does it mean that the LL suffix is not supported in VS 6?  Can you try
the same without the 2 LL suffixes?




This bug report was last modified 16 years and 343 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.