GNU bug report logs - #7190
Crash in menus on w32

Previous Next

Packages: emacs, w32;

Reported by: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:26:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: wontfix

Merged with 7170

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: grischka <grishka <at> gmx.de>
To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman <at> gmail.com>
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: bug#7190: Crash in menus on w32
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:03:30 +0200
Lennart Borgman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:02 PM, grischka <grishka <at> gmx.de> wrote:
>>> I assume that their is either a logical problem with the code inside
>>> Emacs or a bad assumption on how menu callbacks are actually run.
>> Is there a difference between logical problem and bad assumption?
> 
> Yes. The code could be correct under some bad assumptions regarding
> the way the interface to the OS works.
> 
> Is not that an important difference?

Not if you want to fix the bug.

>>> By
>>> adding DebPrint call we could perhaps see if some code where called in
>>> an order we did not expect.
>> Perhaps see the information that you already have?  For example
>>  #7  0x011c4e4b in w32_free_submenu_strings (menu=0x205e3) at w32menu.c:1701
>> is telling where is "some code", and
>>  "Invalid Address specified to RtlFreeHeap( 00850000, 0088BDC8 )"
>> is telling about "order we did not expect", as likely in:  Called
>> twice for the same memory object.  If in doubt, try to prove that
>> it can't happen.
> 
> Yes, perhaps. But it could also be that memory objects are freed in an
> order we did not expect.
> 

Why should it matter in what order "Invalid Address" is passed to free?





This bug report was last modified 12 years and 94 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.