GNU bug report logs - #71626
build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: danclm <at> tutanota.com
Subject: bug#71626: closed (Re: bug#71626: build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv
 failed)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:29:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#71626: build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 71626 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
71626: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=71626
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: danclm--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Cc: danclm <at> tutanota.com, 71626-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#71626: build of
 /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:27:56 +0200

Hello,

danclm--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> writes:

> After a few more attempts guix pull was successful. I don't know what
> happened, I think it was still right to report it.

An erroneous commit made "guix pull" fail. The problem was fixed a few
hours after having been introduced. Unfortunately, you guix pulled
during the time frame it was still present.

Now, everything is in order again. Sorry for the inconvenience!

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: danclm <at> tutanota.com
To: Bug Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: build of
 /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 03:20:21 +0200 (CEST)

After a few more attempts guix pull was successful. I don't know what happened, I think it was still right to report it.

-- 


Jun 17, 2024, 23:41 by danclm <at> tutanota.com:

> Hi Guix,
> I'm getting this bug when attempting to guix pull (it persists with an older generation):
>
> build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
> hint: This usually indicates a bug in one of the channels you are pulling from, or some incompatibility among them.  You can check the build log
> and report the issue to the channel developers.
>
> The channels you are pulling from are: guix.
>
> View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/5m/zanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv.gz'.
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> guix pull: error: build of `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profile.drv' failed
>
> (repl-version 0 1 1)
> Generating package cache for '/gnu/store/gxhl3fny25a9d1rmpl9fr9h8brd1ng4m-profile'...
>
> Backtrace:
> In gnu/packages.scm:
>    439:11 19 (generate-package-cache _)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>    460:18 18 (fold #<procedure expand-cache expr> _ _)
> In gnu/packages.scm:
>    399:37 17 (expand-cache . _)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1411:17 16 (supported-package? #<package acpi-call-linux-module <at> 1?> ?)
> In guix/memoization.scm:
>     101:0 15 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package acpi?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1381:14 14 (_)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>    460:18 13 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa6de0 at guix/packages.scm:13?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1385:44 12 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
> In guix/memoization.scm:
>     101:0 11 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package dwar?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1381:14 10 (_)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>    460:18  9 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa7d20 at guix/packages.scm:13?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1385:44  8 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
> In guix/memoization.scm:
>     101:0  7 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package libb?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
>   1389:39  6 (_)
>   1651:16  5 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
>   1755:47  4 (thunk)
> In gnu/packages/linux.scm:
>   9981:25  3 (native-inputs #<package libbpf <at> 1.4.1 gnu/packages/linu?>)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1685:16  2 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>   1780:13  1 (_ #<&compound-exception components: (#<&undefined-vari?>)
> In unknown file:
>            0 (backtrace #<undefined>)
>
> (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (value (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))
>
> Thank you,
> Best regards
>
> --
>
>

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.