GNU bug report logs -
#71626
build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
Previous Next
Reported by: danclm <at> tutanota.com
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:56:03 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 71626 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 71626 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#71626
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:56:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
danclm <at> tutanota.com
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:56:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
After a few more attempts guix pull was successful. I don't know what happened, I think it was still right to report it.
--
Jun 17, 2024, 23:41 by danclm <at> tutanota.com:
> Hi Guix,
> I'm getting this bug when attempting to guix pull (it persists with an older generation):
>
> build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed
> hint: This usually indicates a bug in one of the channels you are pulling from, or some incompatibility among them. You can check the build log
> and report the issue to the channel developers.
>
> The channels you are pulling from are: guix.
>
> View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/5m/zanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv.gz'.
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> guix pull: error: build of `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profile.drv' failed
>
> (repl-version 0 1 1)
> Generating package cache for '/gnu/store/gxhl3fny25a9d1rmpl9fr9h8brd1ng4m-profile'...
>
> Backtrace:
> In gnu/packages.scm:
> 439:11 19 (generate-package-cache _)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 460:18 18 (fold #<procedure expand-cache expr> _ _)
> In gnu/packages.scm:
> 399:37 17 (expand-cache . _)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1411:17 16 (supported-package? #<package acpi-call-linux-module <at> 1?> ?)
> In guix/memoization.scm:
> 101:0 15 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package acpi?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1381:14 14 (_)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 460:18 13 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa6de0 at guix/packages.scm:13?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1385:44 12 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
> In guix/memoization.scm:
> 101:0 11 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package dwar?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1381:14 10 (_)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 460:18 9 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa7d20 at guix/packages.scm:13?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1385:44 8 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
> In guix/memoization.scm:
> 101:0 7 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package libb?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1389:39 6 (_)
> 1651:16 5 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
> 1755:47 4 (thunk)
> In gnu/packages/linux.scm:
> 9981:25 3 (native-inputs #<package libbpf <at> 1.4.1 gnu/packages/linu?>)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1685:16 2 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
> 1780:13 1 (_ #<&compound-exception components: (#<&undefined-vari?>)
> In unknown file:
> 0 (backtrace #<undefined>)
>
> (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (value (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))
>
> Thank you,
> Best regards
>
> --
>
>
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#71626
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:29:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
danclm--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> writes:
> After a few more attempts guix pull was successful. I don't know what
> happened, I think it was still right to report it.
An erroneous commit made "guix pull" fail. The problem was fixed a few
hours after having been introduced. Unfortunately, you guix pulled
during the time frame it was still present.
Now, everything is in order again. Sorry for the inconvenience!
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Reply sent
to
Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:29:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
danclm <at> tutanota.com
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:29:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:24:13 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 337 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.