GNU bug report logs -
#69756
[PATCH gnome-team 0/1] Fix libgda for gnome-team
Previous Next
Reported by: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:17:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sat, 16 Mar 2024 11:00:05 +0000
with message-id <87bk7esaot.fsf <at> cbaines.net>
and subject line Re: [bug#69756] [PATCH gnome-team 1/1] gnu: libgda: Disable failing tests.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #69756,
regarding [PATCH gnome-team 0/1] Fix libgda for gnome-team
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
69756: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69756
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Dear Guix,
libgda fails to build:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgda/-/issues/269
However, some time ago, the maintainers discovered that this specific test was
a pain to maintain, so they disabled it:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgda/-/commit/c0bb1ed662011207ee13d5a20a70f9b55166aa13
I just imported the patch as-is.
Best regards,
Vivien
Vivien Kraus (1):
gnu: libgda: Disable failing tests.
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 1 +
.../libgda-disable-data-proxy-test.patch | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/libgda-disable-data-proxy-test.patch
base-commit: 2ee54513196bad8e663e78ac695b6ffa0da49051
--
2.41.0
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Am Dienstag, dem 12.03.2024 um 19:03 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
>> Le mardi 12 mars 2024 à 18:59 +0100, Liliana Marie Prikler a écrit :
>> > > +Has been difficutl to reproduce the problem when this test
>> > > +is running in Ci, so disabling until we can re-implement it
>> > > +is the better choice
>> > I assume the spelling is [sic]?
>>
>> Correct, I would consider it rude to reword a commit that was
>> accepted by another project. Although it’s the first time I’m facing
>> this situation, so maybe the etiquette says something different.
>
> Well, we indeed prefer upstreamed patches, but some upstreams also add
> their fixes on top of such patches, which we'd have to incorporate as
> well in this case. In the case of libgda, it does however seem that
> this is the newest modification to those files, so my worries were
> somewhat unfounded.
Thanks both, I've pushed this to gnome-team as
64785a7941b5544f80c7f9cd286452fba296596a.
Chris
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 70 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.