GNU bug report logs - #69652
[PATCH gnome-team 0/1] What should we do with orbit2?

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>, 69652 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: rg <at> raghavgururajan.name, maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com
Subject: [bug#69652] [PATCH gnome-team 1/1] gnu: orbit2: Mark it unsupported in 32-bits systems.
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 07:36:32 +0100

Am Freitag, dem 08.03.2024 um 21:03 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
> Le vendredi 08 mars 2024 à 20:11 +0100, Liliana Marie Prikler a
> écrit :
> > Prefer the “disable-failing-tests” pattern, but first investigate
> > why they fail.  Note that this would make icecat and icedove 64-bit
> > only (that is if Rust doesn't do so already).
> 
> Rust has already been introduced in both.
I'd still like to avoid overconstraining if possible.

> > >  $(DEPS) CosNaming.h libname-server-2.a"))))
> > > -         (add-before 'configure 'ignore-deprecations
> > > -           (lambda _
> > > -             (substitute* "linc2/src/Makefile.in"
> > > -               (("-DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED")
> > > -                "-DGLIB_DISABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS")))))))
> > > +          (add-before 'configure 'ignore-deprecations
> > > +            (lambda _
> > > +              (substitute* "linc2/src/Makefile.in"
> > > +                (("-DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED")
> > > +                 "-DGLIB_DISABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS")))))))
> > What changes in this hunk?
> > 
> It’s hard to see, but the indentation changed.  Should it be ignored?
Rather, the cosmetic change should be separated from the semantic
change.

Cheers

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.