GNU bug report logs - #69249
bug in native-compile?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Robert Boyer <robertstephenboyer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 18:31:05 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: notabug

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Robert Boyer <robertstephenboyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, rms <at> gnu.org, 69249 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#69249: Some Utter Emacs magic!
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:39:45 -0600
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> If that's Emacs 28 or older, then yes, that's the best solution you could
use.

I just checked, and 28 is what I have.

And I am so greatful for it because of 'naive-compile'.

Thanks so much,

Bob

sudo apt-get install emacs
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
emacs is already the newest version (1:28.2+1-15).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>

On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 11:42 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Robert Boyer <robertstephenboyer <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 14:24:52 -0600
> > Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <basil <at> contovou.net>, Eli Zaretskii <
> eliz <at> gnu.org>, rms <at> gnu.org
> >
> > If one wants to look at primes-below-... in Emacs, then try
> >
> >     M-x  so-long-mode
> >
> > Without that, M-> kills my Emacs.
>
> If that's Emacs 28 or older, then yes, that's the best solution you
> could use.
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 138 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.