GNU bug report logs - #69097
[PATCH] Add 'kill-region-or-word' command

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: 69097 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#69097: [PATCH] Add 'kill-region-or-word' command
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 01:21:59 +0100

M-DEL and unix-word-rubout have different word boundaries though. I have bindings for both.
-- 
Sean Whitton

Please excuse top-posting and brevity. I am writing to you from a mobile phone.

> On 5 May 2024, at 17:45, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>>>> +(defcustom kill-word-if-no-region nil
>>>> +  "Non-nil means that `kill-region' without a region will kill the last word."
>>>> +  :type 'boolean
>>>> +  :group 'killing)
>>> 
>>> What a strange thing.  `kill-region' is not related to word commands
>>> in no way.  Why not kill a sentence?  Why not kill a line?  Why just word?
>>> All existing commands handle an active region.  But there is no commands
>>> that do in the opposite direction where a general command handles
>>> one random specific case.  This is because the region is a more
>>> general concept.
>> 
>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69097#14 is supposed to
>> provide the rationale (consistency with what C-w does in a terminal,
>> which I presume means in Bash or similar programs which use
>> Readline?).
> 
> So this is for Readline compatibility:
> 
>  unix-word-rubout (C-w)
>    Kill the word behind point, using white space as a word boundary.
>    The killed text is saved on the kill-ring.
> 
> Then I have no opinion, since 'backward-kill-word' (C-<backspace>, M-DEL).
> already does this just fine.
> 
> 
> 

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.