GNU bug report logs - #68321
Request for merging "lisp-team" branch

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>,
 jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:10:17 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

"Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com> skribis:

> On Monday, January 8th, 2024 at 1:12 PM, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
>> I have sbcl <at> 2.4.0 from the lisp-team branch failing to build on
>> powerpc64le and succeeding on aarch64-linux.
>>
>> riscv64-linux failed for me too:
>
> I don't have a ppc64le machine, and I don't know about riscv64,
> but SBCL 2.4.0 needs a patch to build on ppc64 [1].
>
> [1]: https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/commit/255f3ead060129aa097b62f10d054cdc4997a431

I adapted the patch from upstream and added it to the lisp-team branch.

I tried testing the build with "guix build -s powerpc46le-linux sbcl"
on my x86-64 machine, but it failed indicating that the clisp used to
boostrap sbcl isn't working properly. I don't know if the problem comes
from qemu or if clisp is really broken on powerpc64le.
Efraim, could you check on your powerpc64le machine?

I also tried "guix build -s riscv64-linux sbcl", but it didn't work,
because some dependencies fail to build (like gnutls).

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.