GNU bug report logs - #68321
Request for merging "lisp-team" branch

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 68321 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 68321 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>,
 "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>, Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>
Subject: Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 13:06:30 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

The main update of the branch is sbcl 2.4.0.

The CI built it fine for x86-64 and i686, but has not tried yet on
other architectures (after several days jobs are still in "scheduled"
state).

If you can, please test the branch and report any issue here.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #8 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>,
 "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 20:12:13 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 01:06:30PM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote:
> The main update of the branch is sbcl 2.4.0.
> 
> The CI built it fine for x86-64 and i686, but has not tried yet on
> other architectures (after several days jobs are still in "scheduled"
> state).
> 
> If you can, please test the branch and report any issue here.

I have sbcl <at> 2.4.0 from the lisp-team branch failing to build on
powerpc64le and succeeding on aarch64-linux.

riscv64-linux failed for me too:

"obj/from-xc/src/code/early-float.lisp-obj" fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 553 tid 553:
internal error too early in init, can't recover

Error opening /dev/tty: No such device or address
Internal error #1 "An attempt was made to use an undefined FDEFINITION." at 0x4101560
    SC: 0, Offset: 28   $1=       0x4f286dff: other pointer
Welcome to LDB, a low-level debugger for the Lisp runtime environment.
ldb>



-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[f04vl4bdrzq6qii23vs76cbc9f2ism-sbcl-2.4.0.drv.gz (application/x-gunzip, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #11 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:35:48 +0000

On Monday, January 8th, 2024 at 1:12 PM, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
> I have sbcl <at> 2.4.0 from the lisp-team branch failing to build on
> powerpc64le and succeeding on aarch64-linux.
>
> riscv64-linux failed for me too:

I don't have a ppc64le machine, and I don't know about riscv64,
but SBCL 2.4.0 needs a patch to build on ppc64 [1].

[1]: https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/commit/255f3ead060129aa097b62f10d054cdc4997a431

Message #14 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>,
 jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:10:17 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

"Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com> skribis:

> On Monday, January 8th, 2024 at 1:12 PM, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
>> I have sbcl <at> 2.4.0 from the lisp-team branch failing to build on
>> powerpc64le and succeeding on aarch64-linux.
>>
>> riscv64-linux failed for me too:
>
> I don't have a ppc64le machine, and I don't know about riscv64,
> but SBCL 2.4.0 needs a patch to build on ppc64 [1].
>
> [1]: https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/commit/255f3ead060129aa097b62f10d054cdc4997a431

I adapted the patch from upstream and added it to the lisp-team branch.

I tried testing the build with "guix build -s powerpc46le-linux sbcl"
on my x86-64 machine, but it failed indicating that the clisp used to
boostrap sbcl isn't working properly. I don't know if the problem comes
from qemu or if clisp is really broken on powerpc64le.
Efraim, could you check on your powerpc64le machine?

I also tried "guix build -s riscv64-linux sbcl", but it didn't work,
because some dependencies fail to build (like gnutls).

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #17 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>,
 "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 18:59:52 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:10:17PM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote:
> "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com> skribis:
> 
> > On Monday, January 8th, 2024 at 1:12 PM, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
> >> I have sbcl <at> 2.4.0 from the lisp-team branch failing to build on
> >> powerpc64le and succeeding on aarch64-linux.
> >>
> >> riscv64-linux failed for me too:
> >
> > I don't have a ppc64le machine, and I don't know about riscv64,
> > but SBCL 2.4.0 needs a patch to build on ppc64 [1].
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/commit/255f3ead060129aa097b62f10d054cdc4997a431
> 
> I adapted the patch from upstream and added it to the lisp-team branch.
> 
> I tried testing the build with "guix build -s powerpc46le-linux sbcl"
> on my x86-64 machine, but it failed indicating that the clisp used to
> boostrap sbcl isn't working properly. I don't know if the problem comes
> from qemu or if clisp is really broken on powerpc64le.
> Efraim, could you check on your powerpc64le machine?
> 
> I also tried "guix build -s riscv64-linux sbcl", but it didn't work,
> because some dependencies fail to build (like gnutls).

Sure, I have it building on berlin now for ppc64le and on one of my
machines for riscv64.  I'll let you know how they go.


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>,
 "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 19:36:31 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:10:17PM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote:
> "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com> skribis:
> 
> > On Monday, January 8th, 2024 at 1:12 PM, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
> >> I have sbcl <at> 2.4.0 from the lisp-team branch failing to build on
> >> powerpc64le and succeeding on aarch64-linux.
> >>
> >> riscv64-linux failed for me too:
> >
> > I don't have a ppc64le machine, and I don't know about riscv64,
> > but SBCL 2.4.0 needs a patch to build on ppc64 [1].
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/commit/255f3ead060129aa097b62f10d054cdc4997a431
> 
> I adapted the patch from upstream and added it to the lisp-team branch.
> 
> I tried testing the build with "guix build -s powerpc46le-linux sbcl"
> on my x86-64 machine, but it failed indicating that the clisp used to
> boostrap sbcl isn't working properly. I don't know if the problem comes
> from qemu or if clisp is really broken on powerpc64le.
> Efraim, could you check on your powerpc64le machine?
> 
> I also tried "guix build -s riscv64-linux sbcl", but it didn't work,
> because some dependencies fail to build (like gnutls).

Build was successful on ppc64le


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #23 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>,
 "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 22:24:10 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:10:17PM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote:
> "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com> skribis:
> 
> > On Monday, January 8th, 2024 at 1:12 PM, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
> >> I have sbcl <at> 2.4.0 from the lisp-team branch failing to build on
> >> powerpc64le and succeeding on aarch64-linux.
> >>
> >> riscv64-linux failed for me too:
> >
> > I don't have a ppc64le machine, and I don't know about riscv64,
> > but SBCL 2.4.0 needs a patch to build on ppc64 [1].
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/commit/255f3ead060129aa097b62f10d054cdc4997a431
> 
> I adapted the patch from upstream and added it to the lisp-team branch.
> 
> I tried testing the build with "guix build -s powerpc46le-linux sbcl"
> on my x86-64 machine, but it failed indicating that the clisp used to
> boostrap sbcl isn't working properly. I don't know if the problem comes
> from qemu or if clisp is really broken on powerpc64le.
> Efraim, could you check on your powerpc64le machine?
> 
> I also tried "guix build -s riscv64-linux sbcl", but it didn't work,
> because some dependencies fail to build (like gnutls).

riscv64-linux failure looks similar at first look to the ppc64le failure

"obj/from-xc/src/code/cold-error.lisp-obj"
"obj/from-xc/src/code/early-full-eval.lisp-obj"
"obj/from-xc/src/code/debug-var-io.lisp-obj"
"obj/from-xc/src/code/early-float.lisp-obj" fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 553 tid 553:
internal error too early in init, can't recover

Error opening /dev/tty: No such device or address
Internal error #1 "An attempt was made to use an undefined FDEFINITION." at 0x4101560
    SC: 0, Offset: 28   $1=       0x4f286dff: other pointer
Welcome to LDB, a low-level debugger for the Lisp runtime environment.
ldb>
real    0m0.325s
user    0m0.066s
sys     0m0.242s
error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception:
%exception #<&invoke-error program: "sh" arguments: ("make.sh" "clisp" "--prefix=/gnu/store/wwy4kc4ary627b7igx5cxjsgkl8nq0yv-sbcl-2.4.0" "--dynamic-space-size=3072" "--with-sb-core-compression" "--with-sb-xref-for-internals" "--without-sb-simd") exit-status: 1 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f>
phase `build' failed after 10113.1 seconds

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #26 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>,
 "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:45:09 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:

> riscv64-linux failure looks similar at first look to the ppc64le failure
>
> "obj/from-xc/src/code/cold-error.lisp-obj"
> "obj/from-xc/src/code/early-full-eval.lisp-obj"
> "obj/from-xc/src/code/debug-var-io.lisp-obj"
> "obj/from-xc/src/code/early-float.lisp-obj" fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 553 tid 553:
> internal error too early in init, can't recover
>
> Error opening /dev/tty: No such device or address
> Internal error #1 "An attempt was made to use an undefined FDEFINITION." at 0x4101560
>     SC: 0, Offset: 28   $1=       0x4f286dff: other pointer
> Welcome to LDB, a low-level debugger for the Lisp runtime environment.
> ldb>
> real    0m0.325s
> user    0m0.066s
> sys     0m0.242s
> error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception:
> %exception #<&invoke-error program: "sh" arguments: ("make.sh" "clisp"
> "--prefix=/gnu/store/wwy4kc4ary627b7igx5cxjsgkl8nq0yv-sbcl-2.4.0"
> "--dynamic-space-size=3072" "--with-sb-core-compression"
> "--with-sb-xref-for-internals" "--without-sb-simd") exit-status: 1 term-signal:
> #f stop-signal: #f>
> phase `build' failed after 10113.1 seconds

I reported the issue on riscv64 upstream
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/2048869).

In case there is no fix for riscv64 right now, do you think we should
block sbcl updates, or should we update it anyway as it works on other
architectures, and hope that riscv64 will work again in the future?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #29 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>,
 "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:01:22 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:45:09AM +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote:
> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:
> 
> > riscv64-linux failure looks similar at first look to the ppc64le failure
> >
> > "obj/from-xc/src/code/cold-error.lisp-obj"
> > "obj/from-xc/src/code/early-full-eval.lisp-obj"
> > "obj/from-xc/src/code/debug-var-io.lisp-obj"
> > "obj/from-xc/src/code/early-float.lisp-obj" fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 553 tid 553:
> > internal error too early in init, can't recover
> >
> > Error opening /dev/tty: No such device or address
> > Internal error #1 "An attempt was made to use an undefined FDEFINITION." at 0x4101560
> >     SC: 0, Offset: 28   $1=       0x4f286dff: other pointer
> > Welcome to LDB, a low-level debugger for the Lisp runtime environment.
> > ldb>
> > real    0m0.325s
> > user    0m0.066s
> > sys     0m0.242s
> > error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception:
> > %exception #<&invoke-error program: "sh" arguments: ("make.sh" "clisp"
> > "--prefix=/gnu/store/wwy4kc4ary627b7igx5cxjsgkl8nq0yv-sbcl-2.4.0"
> > "--dynamic-space-size=3072" "--with-sb-core-compression"
> > "--with-sb-xref-for-internals" "--without-sb-simd") exit-status: 1 term-signal:
> > #f stop-signal: #f>
> > phase `build' failed after 10113.1 seconds
> 
> I reported the issue on riscv64 upstream
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/2048869).
> 
> In case there is no fix for riscv64 right now, do you think we should
> block sbcl updates, or should we update it anyway as it works on other
> architectures, and hope that riscv64 will work again in the future?

No need to wait for riscv64 for sbcl.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #32 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>,
 "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:08:04 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:

> No need to wait for riscv64 for sbcl.

Ok. I merged master in lisp-team, and if there are no new breakages,
I'll merge lisp-team in master.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #35 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>,
 "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:10:25 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> skribis:

> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:
>
>> No need to wait for riscv64 for sbcl.
>
> Ok. I merged master in lisp-team, and if there are no new breakages,
> I'll merge lisp-team in master.

I just added a patch from upstream that should fix the riscv build.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #38 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 郑俊杰 <zhengjunjie <at> yandex.com>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>,
 jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>, "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 21:50:37 +0800




> 在 2024年1月11日，06:15，Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> 写道：
> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> skribis:
> 
>> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:
>> 
>>> No need to wait for riscv64 for sbcl.
>> 
>> Ok. I merged master in lisp-team, and if there are no new breakages,
>> I'll merge lisp-team in master.
> 
> I just added a patch from upstream that should fix the riscv build.

now riscv build success for me

Message #41 received at 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: 郑俊杰 <zhengjunjie <at> yandex.com>
Cc: 68321 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>,
 jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>, "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 13:57:50 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

郑俊杰 <zhengjunjie <at> yandex.com> skribis:

>> 在 2024年1月11日，06:15，Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> 写道：
>> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> skribis:
>> 
>>> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:
>>> 
>>>> No need to wait for riscv64 for sbcl.
>>> 
>>> Ok. I merged master in lisp-team, and if there are no new breakages,
>>> I'll merge lisp-team in master.
>> 
>> I just added a patch from upstream that should fix the riscv build.
>
> now riscv build success for me

Great. Thanks for testing.
I think I'll merge lisp-team into master in a few hours.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #46 received at 68321-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: 郑俊杰 <zhengjunjie <at> yandex.com>
Cc: 68321-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>,
 Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>,
 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>, Benjamin Slade <slade <at> lambda-y.net>,
 jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>, "Paul A. Patience" <paul <at> apatience.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#68321] Request for merging "lisp-team" branch
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:07:21 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

lisp-team branch merged into master as
24f000a49a00b8dd3e9f51e08f0ef5567edf04aa.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.