GNU bug report logs - #68229
go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 68229 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 68229 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:29:50 -0500

Hello,

cuirass <at> gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:

> <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
> href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details

The test failure is:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
--- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
    --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
        script_test.go:193: 
            # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
            > go build -o complex.exe complex
            > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
            [stderr]
            # complex
            gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
            [exit status 2]
            FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
            
FAIL
FAIL	cmd/go	46.068s
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #10 received at 68229-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 68229-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:53:15 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> cuirass <at> gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
> 
> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
> >
> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
> 
> The test failure is:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
>     --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
>         script_test.go:193: 
>             # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
>             > go build -o complex.exe complex
>             > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
>             [stderr]
>             # complex
>             gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
>             [exit status 2]
>             FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>             
> FAIL
> FAIL	cmd/go	46.068s
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.

This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #13 received at 68229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 68229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 12:59:22 -0500

Hello,

Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> cuirass <at> gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>> 
>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification
>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information
>> > about this build <a
>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>> >
>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
>> 
>> The test failure is:
>> 
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
>>     --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
>>         script_test.go:193: 
>>             # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
>>             > go build -o complex.exe complex
>>             > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
>>             [stderr]
>>             # complex
>>             gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option
>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
>>             [exit status 2]
>>             FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>>             
>> FAIL
>> FAIL	cmd/go	46.068s
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> 
>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
>
> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.

OK; Cuirass got it wrong again.  Should we leave the ticket open though,
since it's an actual problem?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #16 received at 68229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 68229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 23:31:07 -0500

reopen 68229
quit

Hi,

Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> writes:

> On January 3, 2024 5:59:22 PM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> cuirass <at> gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>>>> 
>>>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification
>>>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information
>>>> > about this build <a
>>>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>>>> >
>>>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
>>>> 
>>>> The test failure is:
>>>> 
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
>>>>     --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
>>>>         script_test.go:193: 
>>>>             # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
>>>>             > go build -o complex.exe complex
>>>>             > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
>>>>             [stderr]
>>>>             # complex
>>>>             gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option
>>>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
>>>>             [exit status 2]
>>>>             FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>>>>             
>>>> FAIL
>>>> FAIL	cmd/go	46.068s
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>> 
>>>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
>>>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
>>>
>>> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.
>>
>>OK; Cuirass got it wrong again.  Should we leave the ticket open though,
>>since it's an actual problem?
>>
> Fine with me. We should probably remove go-1.14 anyway if nothing
> depends on it. And either make it build on ppc64le or mark it not
> supported otherwise.

Alright, I'll leave this open for someone to pick up.  The task would be
to remove go-1.14, incorporating it into go-1.16, which currently
inherits from it.  Any takers?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #19 received at 68229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 68229 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 05:30:10 +0000

On January 10, 2024 4:31:07 AM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>reopen 68229
>quit
>
>Hi,
>
>Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> writes:
>
>> On January 3, 2024 5:59:22 PM UTC, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> cuirass <at> gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>>>>> 
>>>>> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification
>>>>> > <b>master</b> is broken. You can find the detailed information
>>>>> > about this build <a
>>>>> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
>>>>> 
>>>>> The test failure is:
>>>>> 
>>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>>> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
>>>>>     --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
>>>>>         script_test.go:193: 
>>>>>             # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
>>>>>             > go build -o complex.exe complex
>>>>>             > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
>>>>>             [stderr]
>>>>>             # complex
>>>>>             gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option
>>>>> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
>>>>>             [exit status 2]
>>>>>             FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command failure
>>>>>             
>>>>> FAIL
>>>>> FAIL	cmd/go	46.068s
>>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
>>>>> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
>>>>
>>>> This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.
>>>
>>>OK; Cuirass got it wrong again.  Should we leave the ticket open though,
>>>since it's an actual problem?
>>>
>> Fine with me. We should probably remove go-1.14 anyway if nothing
>> depends on it. And either make it build on ppc64le or mark it not
>> supported otherwise.
>
>Alright, I'll leave this open for someone to pick up.  The task would be
>to remove go-1.14, incorporating it into go-1.16, which currently
>inherits from it.  Any takers?
>

https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68300

Although it currently rebuilds all go packages. I should probably fix that.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.