GNU bug report logs - #67752
[PATCH] Fix (setopt register-separator "\n") non-matching type warning

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#67752: closed ([PATCH] Fix (setopt register-separator "\n")
 non-matching type  warning)
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 20:22:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 16 Dec 2023 22:21:10 +0200
with message-id <83cyv5lwzt.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#67752: [PATCH] Fix (setopt register-separator "\n") non-matching type warning
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #67752,
regarding [PATCH] Fix (setopt register-separator "\n") non-matching type  warning
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
67752: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=67752
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: gerard.vermeulen <at> posteo.net
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix (setopt register-separator "\n") non-matching type 
 warning
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 17:37:49 +0000

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

attached patch fixes "(setopt register-separator "\n") non-matching
type warnings" and makes the register-separator documentation
less confusing to me.

Regards -- Gerard

[0001-Fix-setopt-register-separator-n-non-matching-type-wa.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: gerard.vermeulen <at> posteo.net
Cc: 67752-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#67752: [PATCH] Fix (setopt register-separator "\n")
 non-matching type warning
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 22:21:10 +0200

> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 20:02:43 +0000
> From: gerard.vermeulen <at> posteo.net
> Cc: 67752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> 
> 
> On 16.12.2023 13:06, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > tags 67752 notabug
> [...]
> > I think register-separator is supposed to be a register, not a
> > separator string.  That's how it is documented.
> > 
> > So I don't think these changes should be installed.
> > 
> Indeed, I did not understand from the documentation that the
> "+" register is special and that one can do directly:
> (set-register ?+ "\n*REGISTER SEPARATOR*\n")
> 
> I am sorry for the noise and you can close the bug as far as it
> concerns me.

No need to apologize.  I'm closing the bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.