GNU bug report logs - #66404
[PATCH] Use delete-all-overlays in clean-mode

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 66404 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 66404 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Joseph Turner <joseph <at> breatheoutbreathe.in>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Use delete-all-overlays in clean-mode
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 02:58:45 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Tags: patch

Is there a reason to use dolist instead of delete-all-overlays?

[0001-Use-delete-all-overlays-in-clean-mode.patch (text/patch, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 66404 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Joseph Turner <joseph <at> breatheoutbreathe.in>
Cc: 66404 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66404: [PATCH] Use delete-all-overlays in clean-mode
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 13:26:16 +0300

> Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 02:58:45 -0700
> From:  Joseph Turner via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> 
> Is there a reason to use dolist instead of delete-all-overlays?

Already asked.

Message #13 received at 66404 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Joseph Turner <joseph <at> breatheoutbreathe.in>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 66404 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66404: [PATCH] Use delete-all-overlays in clean-mode
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 03:32:40 -0700

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 02:58:45 -0700
>> From:  Joseph Turner via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>>
>> Is there a reason to use dolist instead of delete-all-overlays?
>
> Already asked.

Oops! Sorry, please close this. (Is there a way for me to close my own issues?)

Message #18 received at 66404-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Joseph Turner <joseph <at> breatheoutbreathe.in>
Cc: 66404-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66404: [PATCH] Use delete-all-overlays in clean-mode
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 14:40:54 +0300

> From: Joseph Turner <joseph <at> breatheoutbreathe.in>
> Cc: 66404 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 03:32:40 -0700
> 
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 02:58:45 -0700
> >> From:  Joseph Turner via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> >>
> >> Is there a reason to use dolist instead of delete-all-overlays?
> >
> > Already asked.
> 
> Oops! Sorry, please close this.

Done.

> (Is there a way for me to close my own issues?)

Yes, see admin/notes/bugtracker.

Message #30 received at 66404-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Joseph Turner <joseph <at> breatheoutbreathe.in>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 66404-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#66404: [PATCH] Use delete-all-overlays in clean-mode
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 13:54:09 -0700

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Joseph Turner <joseph <at> breatheoutbreathe.in>
>>
>> (Is there a way for me to close my own issues?)
>
> Yes, see admin/notes/bugtracker.

Thank you!! I was not aware of this.

Stefan: Please consider mentioning admin/notes/bugtracker in your talk.

Joseph

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.