GNU bug report logs - #66063
[PATCH v2 0/3] Resolve a circular module dependencies in embedded modules

Previous Next

Full log

Message #10 received at 66063-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, 66063-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 65860-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66063: [PATCH v2 0/3] Resolve a circular module
 dependencies in embedded modules
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 13:58:26 -0400

Hi,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Ludovic,
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> I agree that this needs to be addressed.  I wondered whether/how hard we
>> should search for a different solution.
>
> OK.  I think the current situation needs to be resolved ASAP, but longer
> term I'm definitely willing to revisit our strategy when it comes to
> cross compiler toolchains.
>
> [...]
>
>> BTW, another issue with the package-returning procedures: they return a
>> fresh package object at each call, which defeats caching.  I think you
>> should be able to observe it with:
>>
>>   GUIX_PROFILING=object-cache guix build axoloti-runtime -d  --no-grafts
>>
>> The effect will be more acute on the build farms since they compute
>> derivations for everything that depends on these toolchains.
>>
>> The solution would be to make those procedures memoizing, with ‘mlambda’
>> or similar.
>
> I haven't tried measuring the impact, but I've use mlambda in the v2
> just sent; thanks for the suggesting it!

I've now pushed this series.  If we can make AVR a native
target/platform in Guix, that may make things simpler/nicer, but
otherwise, this is at least resolved.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.