GNU bug report logs - #65902
29.0.92; emacsclient-mail.desktop fails due to complicated escaping

Previous Next

Full log

Message #22 received at 65902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: sbaugh <at> catern.com, 65902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65902: 29.0.92;
 emacsclient-mail.desktop fails due to complicated escaping
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:41:48 +0300

> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 20:46:54 -0700
> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
> 
> On 9/12/2023 7:30 PM, sbaugh <at> catern.com wrote:
> > tags 65902 + patch
> > quit
> > 
> > This patch avoids the complicated scripting needed for
> > emacsclient-mail.desktop by adding a new flag to emacsclient, --funcall,
> > which mirrors emacs --funcall and allows emacsclient-mail.desktop to be
> > basically the same as emacs-mail.desktop.
> 
> I think this is actually the same as the (very long) bug#57752, so 
> thanks for working on this. (It was on my list of things to get to, but 
> I just haven't had time.)
> 
> Over there, we agreed that something like your patch is wanted, albeit 
> with two caveats:
> 
> 1. Since "--funcall" for the regular "emacs" binary doesn't pass 
> arguments to the function, how about we call this option "--apply" instead?
> 
> 2. It would be great if we could get "--apply" for the regular "emacs" 
> binary too, so that both programs work the same way (at least in this 
> regard). Even better, if you could forward "--apply" from "emacsclient" 
> to the alternate editor (which would be "emacs" 99% of the time) 
> automatically. That works, in a roundabout way, for the Emacs daemon, 
> but not if the alternate editor is "emacs".

This is how that bug's discussion started.  Are we going to have it
all one more time?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.