GNU bug report logs - #65734
29.1.50; kill-whole-line and visibility of Org subtrees

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 65734 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, manikulin <at> gmail.com, emacs-orgmode <at> gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, iota <at> whxvd.name
Subject: bug#65734: [BUG] kill-whole-line on folded subtrees [9.6.8 (release_9.6.8-3-g21171d @ /home/w/usr/emacs/0/29/0/lisp/org/)]
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 16:03:41 +0200

> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
> Cc: monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-orgmode <at> gnu.org, 65734 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>  manikulin <at> gmail.com, iota <at> whxvd.name
> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 12:39:18 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> I think that I see what you mean. What we can do to achieve this is
> >> changing `kill-line-query-function' into abnormal hook
> >> `kill-line-query-functions'. Then, `kill-line'/`kill-whole-line' will
> >> use (run-hook-with-args-until-success 'kill-line-query-functions) to
> >> decide whether to show a query.
> >> 
> >> Does it make sense?
> >
> > It might, yes.  But do we have to _replace_ the hook? cannot we have
> > both?  I.e. if the new one is defined, call it, otherwise call the old
> > one.  That would be more backward-compatible, I think.
> 
> May you please elaborate what you mean by "old one"?

kill-line-query-function

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.