GNU bug report logs - #65733
29.1.50; seq 2.23 in Emacs 29 not the same as seq 2.23 on ELPA

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 65733 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 65733 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong <wyuenho <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 29.1.50; seq 2.23 in Emacs 29 not the same as seq 2.23 on ELPA
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:42:58 +0100

I was trying to find out why `seq-split` and `seq-keep` are missing on
the seq package version 2.23 on ELPA and realized even though the seq
package in Emacs 29 is at version 2.23, it's not the same as the same
package of the same version on ELPA.

The version in Emacs 29 probably needs a version bump and then apply the
changes to ELPA and bump that version too.

Message #8 received at 65733 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong <wyuenho <at> gmail.com>, 65733 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65733: 29.1.50; seq 2.23 in Emacs 29 not the same as seq 2.23
 on ELPA
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 08:20:57 -0700

forcemerge 60990 65733
thanks

Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong <wyuenho <at> gmail.com> writes:

> I was trying to find out why `seq-split` and `seq-keep` are missing on
> the seq package version 2.23 on ELPA and realized even though the seq
> package in Emacs 29 is at version 2.23, it's not the same as the same
> package of the same version on ELPA.
>
> The version in Emacs 29 probably needs a version bump and then apply the
> changes to ELPA and bump that version too.

This is a duplicate of Bug#60990.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.