GNU bug report logs - #65162
30.0.50; [PATCH] Simplify some internal Eshell command parsing functions

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 00:17:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65162: closed (30.0.50; [PATCH] Simplify some internal Eshell
 command parsing functions)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:59:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:57:55 -0700
with message-id <9c426dde-f357-08d9-5546-ff1cb24864f8 <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#65162: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Simplify some internal Eshell command parsing functions
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #65162,
regarding 30.0.50; [PATCH] Simplify some internal Eshell command parsing functions
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
65162: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65162
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Simplify some internal Eshell command parsing
 functions
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 17:16:30 -0700
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
These changes are just there for cleanup, and to make it easier to work 
with this code going forward. Since Eshell command parsing now has 
fairly-thorough regression tests, I think these changes should be pretty 
safe.

In the second patch, I removed the need to use a dynamically-bound 
variable, but kept the old (now obsolete) function around for 
compatibility. I doubt any external packages are using this, but better 
safe than sorry...
[0001-Simplify-command-parsing-in-Eshell.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
[0002-Return-separators-from-eshell-split-commands-directl.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
To: 65162-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65162: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Simplify some internal Eshell command
 parsing functions
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:57:55 -0700
On 8/8/2023 5:16 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
> These changes are just there for cleanup, and to make it easier to work 
> with this code going forward. Since Eshell command parsing now has 
> fairly-thorough regression tests, I think these changes should be pretty 
> safe.

Merged to master as 60090abcbc5, and closing this now.


This bug report was last modified 1 year and 289 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.