GNU bug report logs - #65157
30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de>

Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 19:37:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de
Subject: bug#65157: 30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings?
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:37:33 +0800
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
>> Cc: jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de,  65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 21:28:44 +0800
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> > I suggest to add @node's there.
>> 
>> Thanks.  How about @subsection's?  The relative importance of the
>> contents of those node-less sections doesn't justify placement in
>> their own nodes, IMHO.
>
> Why do you need justification for adding @node's?  What is the
> downside of having them.  The advantage is clear: easier navigation
> with SPC and DEL.
>
> If you don't need a @node, please ask yourself why you need a @section
> of @subsection?
>
> But if you are dead set on not adding @node's, please make those
> @node-less @sections @unnumberedsec instead.

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 287 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.