GNU bug report logs - #65157
30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings?

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 65157 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 65157 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings?
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 21:36:05 +0200

At 72e24ed0316542184f40c05eda2bf7c77808ec0c with all default
configuration I get after

  make -j8 bootstrap

the following warnings:

[...]
./android.texi:320: warning: node `Android Windowing' is next for 
`Android Environment' in menu but not in sectioning
./android.texi:528: warning: node `Android Environment' is prev for 
`Android Windowing' in menu but not in sectioning
[...]
In end of data:
touch-screen.el:163:16: Warning: the function 
‘pixel-scroll-precision-scroll-up-page’ is not known to be defined.
touch-screen.el:162:18: Warning: the function 
‘pixel-scroll-precision-scroll-down-page’ is not known to be defined.
[...]

Pls let me know if you need more information on that ...

Message #8 received at 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
To: Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de>
Cc: 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65157: 30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings?
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:53:13 +0800

Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de> writes:

> At 72e24ed0316542184f40c05eda2bf7c77808ec0c with all default
> configuration I get after
>
>   make -j8 bootstrap
>
> the following warnings:
>
> [...]
> ./android.texi:320: warning: node `Android Windowing' is next for
> `Android Environment' in menu but not in sectioning
> ./android.texi:528: warning: node `Android Environment' is prev for
> `Android Windowing' in menu but not in sectioning

I don't receive this warning here, nor can I locate any inconsistencies
between the menu and sectioning.  What version of Texinfo is that?

> In end of data:
> touch-screen.el:163:16: Warning: the function
> ‘pixel-scroll-precision-scroll-up-page’ is not known to be defined.
> touch-screen.el:162:18: Warning: the function
> ‘pixel-scroll-precision-scroll-down-page’ is not known to be defined.
> [...]

This should be fixed now.

Message #11 received at 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
Cc: 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de
Subject: Re: bug#65157: 30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings?
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 16:07:31 +0300

> Cc: 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:53:13 +0800
> From:  Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> 
> Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de> writes:
> 
> > ./android.texi:320: warning: node `Android Windowing' is next for
> > `Android Environment' in menu but not in sectioning
> > ./android.texi:528: warning: node `Android Environment' is prev for
> > `Android Windowing' in menu but not in sectioning
> 
> I don't receive this warning here, nor can I locate any inconsistencies
> between the menu and sectioning.

I see you used @section's without a @node.  Why did you do that?  It
is in general not recommended, as it makes it harder for the readers
to find those node-less sections.

I suggest to add @node's there.

Message #14 received at 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de
Subject: Re: bug#65157: 30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings?
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 21:28:44 +0800

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> Cc: 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:53:13 +0800
>> From:  Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>> 
>> Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de> writes:
>> 
>> > ./android.texi:320: warning: node `Android Windowing' is next for
>> > `Android Environment' in menu but not in sectioning
>> > ./android.texi:528: warning: node `Android Environment' is prev for
>> > `Android Windowing' in menu but not in sectioning
>> 
>> I don't receive this warning here, nor can I locate any inconsistencies
>> between the menu and sectioning.
>
> I see you used @section's without a @node.  Why did you do that?  It
> is in general not recommended, as it makes it harder for the readers
> to find those node-less sections.
>
> I suggest to add @node's there.

Thanks.  How about @subsection's?  The relative importance of the
contents of those node-less sections doesn't justify placement in
their own nodes, IMHO.

Message #17 received at 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
Cc: 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de
Subject: Re: bug#65157: 30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings?
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 16:45:19 +0300

> From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
> Cc: jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de,  65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 21:28:44 +0800
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > I suggest to add @node's there.
> 
> Thanks.  How about @subsection's?  The relative importance of the
> contents of those node-less sections doesn't justify placement in
> their own nodes, IMHO.

Why do you need justification for adding @node's?  What is the
downside of having them.  The advantage is clear: easier navigation
with SPC and DEL.

If you don't need a @node, please ask yourself why you need a @section
of @subsection?

But if you are dead set on not adding @node's, please make those
@node-less @sections @unnumberedsec instead.

Message #20 received at 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de>
To: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
Cc: 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65157: 30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings?
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 20:58:32 +0200

On 2023-08-09  03:53, Po Lu wrote:

>> ./android.texi:320: warning: node `Android Windowing' is next for
>> `Android Environment' in menu but not in sectioning
>> ./android.texi:528: warning: node `Android Environment' is prev for
>> `Android Windowing' in menu but not in sectioning
> 
> I don't receive this warning here, nor can I locate any inconsistencies
> between the menu and sectioning.  What version of Texinfo is that?

Not sure whether still relevant after Eli's remarks on @nodes vs
@sections, but I use

  [emacs-master]$ makeinfo --version
  texi2any (GNU texinfo) 6.7

  Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later 
<http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
  This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
  There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Message #23 received at 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de
Subject: Re: bug#65157: 30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings?
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:37:33 +0800

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
>> Cc: jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de,  65157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 21:28:44 +0800
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> > I suggest to add @node's there.
>> 
>> Thanks.  How about @subsection's?  The relative importance of the
>> contents of those node-less sections doesn't justify placement in
>> their own nodes, IMHO.
>
> Why do you need justification for adding @node's?  What is the
> downside of having them.  The advantage is clear: easier navigation
> with SPC and DEL.
>
> If you don't need a @node, please ask yourself why you need a @section
> of @subsection?
>
> But if you are dead set on not adding @node's, please make those
> @node-less @sections @unnumberedsec instead.

Thanks.

Message #28 received at 65157-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4gnu <at> vodafonemail.de>
To: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 65157-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#65157: 30.0.50; Android port post-merge warnings?
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:23:30 +0200

On 2023-08-10  02:37, Po Lu wrote:

>> But if you are dead set on not adding @node's, please make those
>> @node-less @sections @unnumberedsec instead.
> 
> Thanks.

Seems to be resolved, thanks, closing this bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.