GNU bug report logs - #64791
30.0.50; [PATCH] Fix dired mismatch on some filenames

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Manuel Giraud <manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr>

Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 13:24:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 30.0.50

Fixed in version 30.1

Done: Manuel Giraud <manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
To: Manuel Giraud <manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 64791 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#64791: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Fix dired mismatch on some filenames
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2023 16:22:49 +0800
Manuel Giraud <manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr> writes:

> I don't know if this count as a test but it seems that both FreeBSD and
> NetBSD also called it "gls" in their respective packages:
>
> https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/sysutils/coreutils/pkg-plist
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/sysutils/coreutils/PLIST?rev=1.22&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
>
> But, I have to say that I still don't understand why you would not also
> consider applying my patch.

The popular name for GNU ls is actually `ls', given that you install
Coreutils from the release tarball.  Favoring `gls' over `ls' will lead
to Emacs overlooking a potentially newer Coreutils installation as long
as one from the package manager is already present.

Have the BSDs abjured the nasty habit of placing site software in a
single /usr/local directory?  If so, we could perhaps search in the
directory where they install GNU software, i.e. /usr/sfw (?)




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 237 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.