GNU bug report logs - #64643
[PATCH] gnu: ghc-8.10: Fix build on i686-linux.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 09:40:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#64643: closed ([PATCH] gnu: ghc-8.10: Fix build on i686-linux.)
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 13:01:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 13:58:56 +0100
with message-id <87r0p6y9pc.fsf <at> cbaines.net>
and subject line Re: [bug#64643] [PATCH] gnu: ghc-8.10: Fix build on i686-linux.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #64643,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: ghc-8.10: Fix build on i686-linux.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
64643: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64643
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ghc-8.10: Fix build on i686-linux.
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 10:39:30 +0100
As one profiling test fails very repeatedly on the bordeaux build farm, but
ghc did seem to build successfully on other machines.

* gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc-8.10)[arguments]: Don't run the T11627a
profiling test on i686-linux.
---
 gnu/packages/haskell.scm | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm b/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
index 6b2c86fec4..62815efbb1 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
@@ -1271,8 +1271,11 @@ (define-public ghc-8.10
            ;; next rebuild. Note that they are required for GHC 8.10 and 9.2.
            #$@(if (string-prefix? "i686" (or (%current-target-system)
                                              (%current-system)))
-               #~((add-after 'skip-failing-tests-i686 'skip-failing-tests-i686-cuirass
+               #~((add-after 'skip-failing-tests-i686 'skip-more-failing-tests-i686
                     (lambda _
+                      (substitute* '("testsuite/tests/profiling/should_run/all.T")
+                        (("test\\('T11627a', \\[ ")
+                         "test('T11627a', [ when(arch('i386'), skip), "))
                       (substitute* '("testsuite/driver/testlib.py")
                         ((".*changes being made to the file will invalidate the code signature.*")
                          "")

base-commit: b5a5e4d712d0a1998995be62bb41b03955b7dcf1
prerequisite-patch-id: 3297b62c093009d94f43908e88dfc50a53ccbeac
-- 
2.41.0



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>
Cc: 64643-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#64643] [PATCH] gnu: ghc-8.10: Fix build on i686-linux.
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 13:58:56 +0100
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net> writes:

> Hi,
>
>> Yep, you can click the "View build on https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org"
>> links from this page [1] to find the build logs for all the failing
>> builds.
>>
>> 1: https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/sp4csvzxjzzjhmyp7sfdxg3ypqpysh2a-ghc-8.10.7.drv
>
> huh, a segfault. Weird. Perhaps it’s running out of address space.
>
>> And yes, this patch only affects i686-linux as confirmed by [2].
>
> Ah, you’re right. I missed this patch context:
>
>>           #$@(if (string-prefix? "i686" (or (%current-target-system)
>>                                             (%current-system)))
>
> Looks good to me then!

Great, I've pushed this to master as
ad08f9331fee7a8e71e94b02f86f54ab3e1001a8.

There's ~2000 affected packages, but I think this is OK since at least
for the bordeaux build farm, these packages are being unblocked rather
than rebuilt, and for ci, it'll take no time at all to catch up.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 23 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.