GNU bug report logs - #64272
28.1; lisp_file_lexically_bound_p behavior mismatches file local variables

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: LdBeth <andpuke <at> foxmail.com>

Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 18:24:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: confirmed

Merged with 67321

Found in versions 28.1, 29.1.90

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: LdBeth <andpuke <at> foxmail.com>
Cc: 64272 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: bug#64272: 28.1; lisp_file_lexically_bound_p behavior mismatches file local variables
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 09:08:43 +0300
> Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 21:11:11 -0500
> From: LdBeth <andpuke <at> foxmail.com>
> Cc: LdBeth <andpuke <at> foxmail.com>,
> 	Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>,
> 	64272 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Eli> I think we should do the latter, because
> Eli> hack-local-variables-prop-line is more lenient than
> Eli> lisp_file_lexically_bound_p.
> 
> Eli> Stefan, any comments?
> 
> If so, I think the only thing needs to be changed is
> remove the `if (ch != ';')` test.
> 
> Since from what I test, even if first line is something like
> 
> |(setq tmp " -*- lexical-binding: t -*- ")
> 
> the file local variables would still be applied.

I'm not sure we want to support this outside of a Lisp comment.
Stefan, WDYT?  Could false positives cause harm?




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 156 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.