GNU bug report logs -
#64271
libasr is unmaintained upstream
Previous Next
Reported by: Omar Polo <op <at> omarpolo.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:14:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 64271 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 64271 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#64271
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:14:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Omar Polo <op <at> omarpolo.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:14:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
I'm not a guix user so can't send patches, hope this is the correct
way to report issues however.
The upstream libasr-portable repository was archived, as the project
was unmaintained (and unmaintenable in some sense) for some time:
https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/libasr/
OpenSMTPD (its only consumer I guess) doesn't depend on it anymore, it
should be built with the bundled version that was updated.
The configure script still looks for `libasr' so that it continues to
build on OpenBSD, but on other systems it should use the bundled
libasr. There's a configure flag --with-bundled-libasr to force the
usage of the bundled version.
Thanks,
Omar Polo
P.S.: looking at the recipe for OpenSMTPD I noticed the comment
"reccomended, and supports e.g. ECDSA". While it's true that
it's reccomended to build with LibreSSL, ec keys should work
just as fine with OpenSSL. The only issue is the combo OpenSSL
3.x + LibreTLS 3.7.0 due to a known regression that will be
fixed in a upcoming release (I hope) since LibreSSL' tls did it:
https://github.com/libressl/openbsd/commit/318ad8e73e
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#64271
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Omar Polo 写道:
> I'm not a guix user so can't send patches, hope this is the
> correct
> way to report issues however.
Yep.
> The upstream libasr-portable repository was archived, as the
> project
> was unmaintained (and unmaintenable in some sense) for some
> time:
>
> https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/libasr/
>
> OpenSMTPD (its only consumer I guess) doesn't depend on it
> anymore, it
> should be built with the bundled version that was updated.
Removed libasr in commit 902a48e0d3ce4a1983a6d3f71472639a8e59c48f.
> P.S.: looking at the recipe for OpenSMTPD I noticed the comment
> "reccomended, and supports e.g. ECDSA". While it's true
> that
> it's reccomended to build with LibreSSL, ec keys should
> work
> just as fine with OpenSSL. The only issue is the combo
> OpenSSL
> 3.x + LibreTLS 3.7.0 due to a known regression that will
> be
> fixed in a upcoming release (I hope) since LibreSSL' tls
> did it:
> https://github.com/libressl/openbsd/commit/318ad8e73e
OpenSMTPd temporarily(…) builds with openssl with commit
023ff651462f70004c7a92b19fd072ee3138e5a2, so the comment is gone.
Thanks!
T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Omar Polo <op <at> omarpolo.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:18:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#64271
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道:
> OpenSMTPd temporarily(…) builds with openssl with commit
> 023ff651462f70004c7a92b19fd072ee3138e5a2, so the comment is
> gone.
Heh. I see you released -p1 literally while I was typing that :-)
Thanks!
T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#64271
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#64271
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 01 Jul 2023 08:27:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2023/06/30 19:32:57 +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> wrote:
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道:
> > OpenSMTPd temporarily(…) builds with openssl with commit
> > 023ff651462f70004c7a92b19fd072ee3138e5a2, so the comment is
> > gone.
>
> Heh. I see you released -p1 literally while I was typing that :-)
thanks for taking care of removing asr and updating opensmtpd!
> Thanks!
>
> T G-R
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#64271
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 01 Jul 2023 08:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 29 Jul 2023 11:24:13 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 322 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.