GNU bug report logs - #63800
30.0.50; [ELPA] Inaccurate installation instructions for built-in packages

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>

Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 08:01:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.50

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Cc: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>, 63800 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#63800: 30.0.50; [ELPA] Inaccurate installation instructions for built-in packages
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 20:56:45 +0000
Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net> writes:

>> Perhaps a simpler alternative is to stop referencing 'package-install'
>> and instead point uses to 'M-x list-packages'.
>
> I think this would be better as well.  A lot of users don't even know
> what version they use, so we should have to describe how to find that
> out as well.

I hope that we do not have a situation on ELPA where a package cannot be
installed at all on older Emacs.

> ... And if that isn't enough, we would also have to explain
> what core, built-in and ELPA packages are, and how they interact.  Not
> worth it, IMO.

I think it is still worth mentioning that some packages may already be
shipped with Emacs. I do not feel too strongly about this though.

I am OK with changing the installation/upgrade instructions to M-x
list-packages for built-in packages.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 176 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.