GNU bug report logs -
#62754
[PATCH] doc: Use G-Expressions for package definition example.
Previous Next
Reported by: Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 15:14:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hello,
Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu> writes:
> + (list
> + #:phases
> + #~(modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (delete 'configure)
> + (add-before 'build 'set-prefix-in-makefile
> + (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
> + ;; Modify the makefile so that its
> + ;; 'PREFIX' variable points to #$output and
> + ;; 'XMLLINT' points to the correct path.
> + (substitute* "Makefile"
> + (("PREFIX =.*")
> + (string-append "PREFIX = " #$output "\n"))
> + (("XMLLINT =.*")
> + (string-append "XMLLINT = "
> + (search-input-file inputs "/bin/xmllint")
> + "\n"))))))))))
> @end lisp
>
> The new phase that is inserted is written as an anonymous procedure,
> -introduced with @code{lambda*}; it honors the @code{outputs} parameter
> -we have seen before. @xref{Build Utilities}, for more about the helpers
> -used by this phase, and for more examples of @code{modify-phases}.
> +introduced with @code{lambda*}. @xref{Build Utilities}, for more about
> +the helpers used by this phase, and for more examples of
> +@code{modify-phases}.
I think it still makes sense to refer to `inputs'; it could be
unsettling otherwise. Maybe something along those lines:
... introduced with @code{lambda*}; it looks for the @file{xmllint}
executable in a @file{"/bin"} directory among package's inputs
(@pxref{package Reference}). It also honors the @code{outputs}
parameter we have seen before <at> xref{Build Utilities}, for more...
WDYT?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 17 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.