GNU bug report logs - #62171
[PATCH 0/2] Fix source build of OpenJDK 9 and 10

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Björn Höfling
 <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#62171: closed ([PATCH 0/2] Fix source build of OpenJDK 9 and 10)
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 09:11:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:10:42 +0100
with message-id <20230316101042.48c0bc55 <at> tangletp>
and subject line Re: [bug#62171] [PATCH 0/2] Fix source build of OpenJDK 9 and 10
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #62171,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] Fix source build of OpenJDK 9 and 10
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
62171: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62171
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
To: <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Fix source build of OpenJDK 9 and 10
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 23:49:35 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

This fixes  62071.

Björn Höfling (2):
  gnu: openjdk9: Build from hg.
  gnu: openjdk10: Build from hg.

 gnu/packages/java.scm | 41 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)


base-commit: 5312d798ac36a72d8a977325a7c6ff7647be670a
-- 
2.39.1

[Message part 4 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
To: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
Cc: 62171-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#62171] [PATCH 0/2] Fix source build of OpenJDK 9 and 10
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:10:42 +0100

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:02:26 +0100
Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> wrote:

> Both LGTM. The snippet doesn't need to end with #t anymore. Also not
> sure if it's my mail client or the patch, but there's a newline
> missing at the end of the snippets, before sha256.

Good hint: That newline was left out only in the email. I need to
re-check my client's configuration next time.

Thanks for the review,

with your changes pushed as

7636c49b45adb9870cf416c64bde032ec858a820

Björn

[Message part 7 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.