GNU bug report logs - #60663
[PATCH] gnu: linux-libre: Update to 6.1.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 60663 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 60663 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: linux-libre: Update to 6.1.
Date: Sun,  8 Jan 2023 15:50:55 -0500

* gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre-version, linux-libre-gnu-revision,
linux-libre-pristine-source, linux-libre-source, linux-libre): Use linux-libre
6.1.
---
 gnu/packages/linux.scm | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 516f8c8507..933af66904 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
@@ -1089,11 +1089,11 @@ (define-public linux-libre-6.0
                        "aarch64-linux" "powerpc64le-linux" "riscv64-linux")
                      #:configuration-file kernel-config))
 
-(define-public linux-libre-version         linux-libre-6.0-version)
-(define-public linux-libre-gnu-revision    linux-libre-6.0-gnu-revision)
-(define-public linux-libre-pristine-source linux-libre-6.0-pristine-source)
-(define-public linux-libre-source          linux-libre-6.0-source)
-(define-public linux-libre                 linux-libre-6.0)
+(define-public linux-libre-version         linux-libre-6.1-version)
+(define-public linux-libre-gnu-revision    linux-libre-6.1-gnu-revision)
+(define-public linux-libre-pristine-source linux-libre-6.1-pristine-source)
+(define-public linux-libre-source          linux-libre-6.1-source)
+(define-public linux-libre                 linux-libre-6.1)
 
 (define-public linux-libre-5.15
   (make-linux-libre* linux-libre-5.15-version
-- 
2.38.1

Message #10 received at 60663 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 60663 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#60663: [PATCH] gnu: linux-libre: Update to 6.1.
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:17:06 -0500

Hi Leo,

Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:

> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre-version, linux-libre-gnu-revision,
> linux-libre-pristine-source, linux-libre-source, linux-libre): Use linux-libre
> 6.1.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/linux.scm | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> index 516f8c8507..933af66904 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> @@ -1089,11 +1089,11 @@ (define-public linux-libre-6.0
>                         "aarch64-linux" "powerpc64le-linux" "riscv64-linux")
>                       #:configuration-file kernel-config))
>  
> -(define-public linux-libre-version         linux-libre-6.0-version)
> -(define-public linux-libre-gnu-revision    linux-libre-6.0-gnu-revision)
> -(define-public linux-libre-pristine-source linux-libre-6.0-pristine-source)
> -(define-public linux-libre-source          linux-libre-6.0-source)
> -(define-public linux-libre                 linux-libre-6.0)
> +(define-public linux-libre-version         linux-libre-6.1-version)
> +(define-public linux-libre-gnu-revision    linux-libre-6.1-gnu-revision)
> +(define-public linux-libre-pristine-source linux-libre-6.1-pristine-source)
> +(define-public linux-libre-source          linux-libre-6.1-source)
> +(define-public linux-libre                 linux-libre-6.1)

I get from this that the pristine source and deblob scripts had already
been added?

What about the changes to the kconfig files; don't they change between
releases?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #13 received at 60663 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 60663 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#60663: [PATCH] gnu: linux-libre: Update to 6.1.
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 20:03:33 -0500

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 02:17:06PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> I get from this that the pristine source and deblob scripts had already
> been added?
> 
> What about the changes to the kconfig files; don't they change between
> releases?

Linux-libre 6.1, and everything that's necessary to use it, was added in
commit cfce55bf4f232791f4341665a01c4cb873f0f60d

This patch would make it the default version.

Message #16 received at 60663 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 60663 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#60663: [PATCH] gnu: linux-libre: Update to 6.1.
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 21:46:29 -0500

Hi,

Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 02:17:06PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> I get from this that the pristine source and deblob scripts had already
>> been added?
>> 
>> What about the changes to the kconfig files; don't they change between
>> releases?
>
> Linux-libre 6.1, and everything that's necessary to use it, was added in
> commit cfce55bf4f232791f4341665a01c4cb873f0f60d
>
> This patch would make it the default version.

Thanks for bringing me up to speed.

I'm stuck on using 5.15 myself due to #59361, so can't comment on the
well functioning of linux-libre 6.1 just yet, but I trust that it
should, so unless someone else saw issues using it, I think you can go
ahead and apply the change.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #21 received at 60663-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 60663-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#60663: [PATCH] gnu: linux-libre: Update to 6.1.
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 00:49:15 -0500

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 09:46:29PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> I'm stuck on using 5.15 myself due to #59361, so can't comment on the
> well functioning of linux-libre 6.1 just yet, but I trust that it
> should, so unless someone else saw issues using it, I think you can go
> ahead and apply the change.

Okay, pushed as ce8a34bc9ab89f31f107383ba791954864aed372

Do you know if #59361 has been reported upstream?

Message #29 received at 60663-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 60663-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#60663: [PATCH] gnu: linux-libre: Update to 6.1.
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 13:20:33 -0500

Hi,

Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 09:46:29PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> I'm stuck on using 5.15 myself due to #59361, so can't comment on the
>> well functioning of linux-libre 6.1 just yet, but I trust that it
>> should, so unless someone else saw issues using it, I think you can go
>> ahead and apply the change.
>
> Okay, pushed as ce8a34bc9ab89f31f107383ba791954864aed372
>
> Do you know if #59361 has been reported upstream?

Yes, I've even bisected it and found the commit responsible for it [0],
but it seems to affect only my particular version of that card, so it's
niche and unlikely to gather much interest.  There's also some details
on how I proceded to do the regression tests at
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59361

[0] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/192

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.